Rated Care Homes

Andrusida Care - Hampshire

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 22 of 205

    rated home care services in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Andrusida Care - Hampshire: inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025.

Andrusida Care - Hampshire: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Alina Homecare Winchester & Basingstoke (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Basingstoke Centre (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Mercy Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    New Beginnings Healthcare Services Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    24/7 Exceptional care limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    Alina Homecare - Fareham Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Old Basing

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 June 2025 (assessment visit 3 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 07 April 2025 to 23 April 2025. This assessment was prompted by a review of the information we held about the service. We received information of concern in relation to complaints about peoples care and staff not arriving at their allocated times. Andrusida Care Hampshire is a domiciliary care agency and provides personal care to people living in their own homes. CQC only inspects where people are receiving the regulated activity personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. At the time of this inspection 33 people were receiving support with personal care. We received information of concern in relation to complaints about peoples care and staff not arriving at their allocated times.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found concerns around elements of the governance systems. We found breaches of regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, fit and proper persons employed and good governance. Risks to people were not always managed safely., including medicines. Staff were not always recruited safely. Quality monitoring systems and records needed to be strengthened to ensure any shortfalls would be identified promptly going forward. Person centred care needed improvements and people’s care, and decision-making records needed to be more comprehensive. There were enough staff deployed to meet people's needs. Staff were kind and caring and had a good understanding of how to meet people’s needs. There was a system in place to enable people to express any concerns or complaints they had. Staff told us how they treated people equally and without discrimination and felt supported by the service.

An assessment has been undertaken of a service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability but is not registered as a specialist service. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found care plans were not always sufficiently comprehensive to ensure staff would know how support the independence and communication needs of autistic people or people with a learning disability. In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment in relation to safe care and treatment and fit and proper persons employed.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the ways people’s medicines and risks were managed. Recruitment was not always safe and put people at risk of harm.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the governance of the service. Governance procedures were not always effective. The provider had not identified all the quality, or risk concerns we found during our inspection. This meant prompt action had not been taken to address shortfalls.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 5 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 5 June 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 5 June 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Angela Appiah
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14107868 (opens Companies House)

Andrusida Care Limited runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South East. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Andrusida Care Limited

  1. –
    Andrusida Care Limited Not yet rated. Home care, Coventry, West Midlands

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Andrusida Care - Hampshire provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Andrusida Care - Hampshire.
When was Andrusida Care - Hampshire last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Andrusida Care - Hampshire was published on 5 June 2025.
Who runs Andrusida Care - Hampshire?
Andrusida Care - Hampshire is run by Andrusida Care Limited. It runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South East.
What is Andrusida Care - Hampshire's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 5 June 2025.

Contact

Phone
07496 849940
Address
Unit 12A, Basepoint Enterprise Centre, Stroudley Road, Basingstoke, RG24 8UP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Alina Homecare Winchester & Basingstoke (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Basingstoke Centre (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Mercy Care Services Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    New Beginnings Healthcare Services Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    24/7 Exceptional care limited Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    Alina Homecare - Fareham Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Old Basing