Rated Care Homes

OSJCT Moorside Place

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 84 of 106

    rated home care services in Oxfordshire are rated Good, like this one.

OSJCT Moorside Place: inspection record

Home care, Oxfordshire

Rated Good in December 2019.

OSJCT Moorside Place: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Homeease Care Solutions Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Jes Care Services Limited Good, 2.8 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Care Outlook (Oxford) Good, 5.2 miles away

See all home care services in Oxfordshire

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 31 December 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

OSJCT Moorside is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people living in purpose-built extra care housing in two locations, one called Moorside Place and the other called Erdington House. 28 people in total across both sites were receiving personal care. Other people received services to support daily living such as cooking, cleaning and shopping. We only inspected the agency in respect of the personal care delivered. People using the service lived in blocks of apartments which were one and two bedded. Moorside Place had 54 apartments and Erdington House had 56 apartments. Different housing providers ran the two sites, which were about 5 miles apart. Each location had communal areas including communal lounge areas, a café/restaurant, a hairdressers and assisted bathrooms. There were also communal outdoor areas at each site. People in the local community were also able to use the communal lounges, café and hairdressers.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone using the service from OSJCT receives personal care, as some people only required assistance with activities such as cleaning and shopping. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

People and their relatives complimented highly the care and support people received from care staff. They said staff were always attentive to their needs and were very mindful of their privacy and dignity. They said this had a very positive impact on their happiness and well-being. They said care staff were not rushed and always had enough time to support people well and at their own pace. People and staff described how they were able to provide care at times to suit the person, even if this was not at the planned time. For example, staff would go back to a person if they were not ready to get up for the day.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff went 'the extra mile' to ensure people received the care they needed, Staff made sure this not only met the person's physical needs but also helped them live full and independent lives. People were encouraged by staff to stay independent and be involved in the community as much as possible. This included supporting people to attend activities run within the communal areas at each location, which OSJCT staff helped to run. Activities including hobbies, crafts and a dementia café run by a trained nurse funded by the provider.

Staff were very caring and responded to people's needs at the end of their lives, going above and beyond by showing respect and kindness during people's last days as well as when they died. Families commented extremely positively and commended the care their loved ones had received from staff. They described how staff had showed a lot of empathy, giving up their own time to support people and their families. Compliments described how the family had been well supported at these times and were also encouraged to remain in touch. Where a person had no known family, staff had ensured they attended the funeral and

celebration of peoples' lives afterwards.

People were encouraged to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff supported people in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. The policies and systems in the service supported support this practice. Staff had been trained and understood how to work within the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) and other legislation. Staff understood how each person communicated either verbally or by other means. Staff were able to respond appropriately to people using language they understood.

People were kept safe by staff who understood how to ensure they were not abused. Staff worked with the housing provider to respond to people when their needs changed. There was an alarm system which enabled people to call for staff whether they were in their apartment or in a communal area. This helped to ensure staff responded quickly if someone was in particular need. Staff administered medicines safely and ensured people were kept safe from the risk of infection.

Senior staff and managers understood their responsibilities to monitor the care provided and make improvements where issues were identified.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Adam Alford
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 31 December 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
The Orders Of St. John Care TrustBrand: Orders of St John Care Trust
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03073089 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1048355

The Orders Of St. John Care Trust runs 56 services in England, 24 of them in the South East. 51 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by The Orders Of St. John Care Trust

  1. O
    Grace Care Centre Outstanding. Care home with nursing, South Gloucestershire, South West
  2. O
    Monkscroft Care Centre Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Gloucestershire, South West
  3. O
    OSJCT Gregory House Outstanding. Care home, Lincolnshire, East Midlands
  4. O
    OSJCT Hartsholme House Outstanding. Care home, Lincolnshire, East Midlands

See all 56 services run by The Orders Of St. John Care Trust

Getting help from Oxfordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does OSJCT Moorside Place provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for OSJCT Moorside Place.
When was OSJCT Moorside Place last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for OSJCT Moorside Place was published on 31 December 2019.
Who runs OSJCT Moorside Place?
OSJCT Moorside Place is run by The Orders Of St. John Care Trust. It runs 56 services in England, 24 of them in the South East.
What is OSJCT Moorside Place's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 31 December 2019.