Rated Care Homes

Twelve Trees Home Care Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 81 of 85

    rated home care services in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

Twelve Trees Home Care Limited: inspection record

Home care, Sheffield

Rated Good in January 2020.

Twelve Trees Home Care Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Kingfield Supported Living Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Southcroft Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Sheffield South Home Instead Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Zara Care 786 Limited Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    YourLife (Sheffield) Good, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Sheffield

See all home care services in Ecclesall

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 11 January 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service: Twelve Trees Home Care Limited is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own home. It provides a service to older adults. At the time of our inspection the service was providing support for approximately 100 people. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's experience of using this service and what we found: People spoken with told us they felt safe and did not express any concerns about their safety. At our last inspection we found concerns about the documentation being used to assess people's potential risks. At this inspection we found action had been taken to improve the assessment of people's risks. We saw the system in place to ensure the registered manager was notified of any concerns raised about a person by staff required improvement. The registered manager assured us that immediate action would be taken to ensure all concerns were reported to them or their deputy in their absence.

People who were supported with their medicines told us they received their medication at the right time. The new registered manager had identified the completion of Medication Administration Records required improvement. They had arranged for all care staff to receive refresher training in the new year. We have made a recommendation to the provider about the management of medicines to support them to make further improvements.

During the inspection we found concerns about staff recruitment records as some of the information scanned onto the computer system was incomplete. The registered manager took immediate action in response to our concerns to locate the missing documentation.

People told us they received support from a regular team of staff so they experienced continuity with care. People spoken with told us care workers turned up on time and stayed the full time. A few people told us they had experienced some late calls or irregular calls. If staff were running late people would often receive a call telling them they were delayed. People could ask for a copy of their weekly rota so they could see which care worker was due to visit them.

People spoken with were satisfied with the quality care provided to them. People told us support staff were respectful and treated them in a very caring and supportive way. Most of the relatives we spoke with were satisfied with the quality of care provided. One relative felt improvements could be made, we shared this feedback with the registered manager.

Staff received a range of training and support relevant to their role. The service was in the process of retraining all the care staff at the service. Staff told us they felt fully supported, valued and listened to. People were confident care workers had received appropriate training to meet their needs. Most of the

relatives felt the staff were well trained.

People's needs were assessed and care was planned in a way which met people's individual needs. People were supported with their dietary needs, where this was part of their plan of care. Staff understood the importance of respecting people's diverse needs and promoting independence. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People felt confident they could raise any concerns with the registered manager and those concerns would be taken seriously.

There were quality assurance systems in place to monitor the quality and the safety of the service. People and their relatives were given opportunities to be involved in the service and to give feedback about their experiences.

The registered manager was supported by a team of senior staff and the nominated individual. The service had a live action plan to continuously improve the service. Staff told us management of the service had improved since the new registered manager had been appointed.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 11 January 2020. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Marie Ambler
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 11 January 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
9019518 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Twelve Trees Home Care Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Twelve Trees Home Care Limited.
When was Twelve Trees Home Care Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Twelve Trees Home Care Limited was published on 11 January 2020.
Who runs Twelve Trees Home Care Limited?
Twelve Trees Home Care Limited is run by Twelve Trees Home Care Limited.
What is Twelve Trees Home Care Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 January 2020.

Contact

Address
Suite 9, Cherry Tree Business Centre, Union Road Nether Edge, Sheffield, S11 9EF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Kingfield Supported Living Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Southcroft Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Sheffield South Home Instead Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Zara Care 786 Limited Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    YourLife (Sheffield) Good, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Sheffield

See all home care services in Ecclesall