Helping at Home
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2025
- Newark-on-Trent, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
86 of 114
rated home care services in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.
Helping at Home: inspection record
Rated Good in November 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Adicare Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Helping Hands Newark Good, 0.5 miles away
- O Reach Learning Disability Care C.I.C Outstanding, 0.6 miles away
- G Gladstone House Good, 0.6 miles away
- – Guardian Angel Carers Lincoln & Newark Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 November 2025 (assessment visit 19 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 20 May to 29 May 2025. Helping at Home is a home care service providing support to older people and younger adults living with dementia, physical disabilities, or sensory impairments.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This was our first assessment of Helping at Home. This assessment took place at there new registered address. The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervision to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well.
People and those important to them were involved in the assessment of their needs. Staff carried out assessments considering people’s communication and spiritual needs, their preferences and health needs.
Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions for example, if a person was admitted to hospital. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act and involved those important to people regarding decisions made in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.
People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity, they treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing. People were involved in decisions about their care. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. People received fair and equal care and treatment.
Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. People with protected characteristics felt supported. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. The manager was open to new ideas and there was a culture of learning and continuous improvement. At the time of our assessment, the manager of the service was in the process of becoming the registered manager.
An assessment has been undertaken of a service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability but is not registered as a specialist service. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgments about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centered care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Courtney-Leigh Pike
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Helping at Home Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 13491489 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Nottinghamshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 500 80 80
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Nottinghamshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Helping at Home provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Helping at Home.
- When was Helping at Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Helping at Home was published on 20 November 2025.
- Who runs Helping at Home?
- Helping at Home is run by Helping at Home Ltd.
- What is Helping at Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 November 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01636 646915
- Address
- 65 London Road, Newark, NG24 1RZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Adicare Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Helping Hands Newark Good, 0.5 miles away
- O Reach Learning Disability Care C.I.C Outstanding, 0.6 miles away
- G Gladstone House Good, 0.6 miles away
- – Guardian Angel Carers Lincoln & Newark Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away