Rated Care Homes

KLM Home Cares

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 9 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 50 of 57

    rated home care services in Wakefield are rated Good, like this one.

KLM Home Cares: inspection record

Home care, Wakefield

Rated Good in June 2017.

KLM Home Cares: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Border Cottage Care Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. –
    Home Instead Castleford and Selby Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away
  4. –
  5. RI
    Croft Healthcare Ltd Requires improvement, 2.5 miles away

See all home care services in Wakefield

See all home care services in Castleford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 20 June 2017. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The inspection took place on 8 and 10 May and was announced. This is the first inspection of KLM Home Cares.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

KLM Home Cares is registered as an individual so they are a sole trader who is self-employed. They are registered to provide personal care to people in their own home. Nine people were receiving personal care at the time of the inspection. The individual is the 'registered person'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People we spoke with and their relatives said the service was safe. They were complimentary about the staff who cared for them and had no concerns. They had regular contact with the registered person who was described as 'nice' and 'approachable'. People felt the service was person centred and were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Everyone told us they would recommend the service to others.

People's care was assessed and planned, and preferences around care delivery were identified. When required people received appropriate support to make sure their nutritional and health needs were met. Risk assessments were completed around individual needs and the environment, although at times it was not clear that risk was being appropriately managed because the assessment was confusing. People said they received their medicines as prescribed but guidance around administering medicines was not always appropriate or consistently followed. We have made a recommendation about the management of some medicines.

Staff felt well supported and said they had received training to help them understand how to do their job well. Staff knowledge around safeguarding and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was limited; the registered person said they were going to make sure additional training was provided.

People received care from familiar and consistent care workers who arrived on time and stayed for the agreed length of time. Recruitment checks were carried out before staff started work although these were not always done thoroughly. We have made a recommendation about recruitment.

Everyone we spoke with told us the service was well led. We saw people were encouraged to share their views about the service. The registered person was knowledgeable about the service, its vision and values. They had systems in place for assessing the quality of the service although not all were formalised.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 20 June 2017. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 9 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 20 June 2017. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does KLM Home Cares provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for KLM Home Cares.
When was KLM Home Cares last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for KLM Home Cares was published on 20 June 2017.
Who runs KLM Home Cares?
KLM Home Cares is run by Miss Katy Moffatt.
What is KLM Home Cares's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 June 2017.