Rated Care Homes

Comfort Home Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 85 of 109

    rated home care services in Devon are rated Good, like this one.

Comfort Home Care: inspection record

Home care, Devon

Rated Good in October 2026.

Comfort Home Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Easy Living Care Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. –
    Encounter Live-In Care Devon Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  3. –
    Anglo Support and Housing Ltd Not yet rated, 4.5 miles away
  4. G
    Dedicated Care Good, 4.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Dependable Care Services Limited Requires improvement, 4.8 miles away

See all home care services in Devon

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 October 2026 (assessment visit 10 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

Comfort Home Care is a domiciliary care agency that provides care and support to people living in their own homes.

Who the service is for

This includes people with a range of needs, including dementia, older people, sensory impairment, younger adults and people with a physical disability. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects services where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection, 56 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out this assessment between 4 September and 30 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

The majority of staff who responded to our request for feedback had worked at the service for several years, which meant there was a stable core staff team. They told us they had a regular group of people which they visited and had built positive relationships with them. A staff member said, “I believe it is important to treat every person as an individual and provide care in the way I would want my own family members to be treated.”

Staff told us their induction experience had been positive and the role of the on-call staff provided additional support, which reassured them. For example, “I feel supported, enjoy working with the people we care for and feel that the company provides staff with the training and information needed to do their job well.”

The staff team were up to date in their training and therefore had the skills and knowledge to support people safely. A staff member explained, “Every day you learn something different” and commented the knowledge from their training enabled them to respond confidently to new situations. Staff received medicine training, with their practice observed and records audited.

The manager was clear about their responsibility to report safeguarding concerns, which was confirmed by a safeguarding referral made by the service. Staff also understood their duty to report changes, one said, “We are definitely encouraged to raise any concerns as the client's wellbeing and ours are always top of the list.”

The service had a robust quality assurance system, which included unannounced spot checks on care workers’ practice and record keeping including at weekends. Records linked to people’s care needs and the running of the service were well managed. The management team also had their work audited to ensure standards were maintained.

Care plans were person centred and provided clear up to date guidance on how people wished to be supported. Staff confirmed they had access to relevant information and were kept up to date with changes. Risks were assessed, for example, we saw from records how one person’s care needs had increased over time requiring more specialist equipment and additional staff involvement. Environmental risks were also addressed. A social care professional said, “I have always found that Comfort Home Care have a very clear understanding of their clients and their needs, which is evident when I review clients.”

The manager explained how as a company they took pride in the quality of palliative and end of life care provided by staff. Staff also commented on their role of supporting people with bereavement, which people using the service told us they appreciated. Staff were proud to share how they respected the people they worked with and valued their role in people’s lives.

Staff were positive about the level of support they received from the manager and office staff. They said, “Comfort Home Care is a lovely company to work for” and “I am always treated well and fairly and can always talk to my manager in any situation.” Office staff were also trained to deliver care so could step in when there was unexpected staff sickness or in an emergency. An on-call system for staff operated from 6am - 10pm 7 days a week. A staff member said, “I particularly appreciate the understanding and support I have received from the company when I have needed it. This has made me feel valued as an employee.” A social care professional said, “Generally speaking, staff get to know the clients well and from the feedback I have received from clients, they say that Comfort Home Care are very good.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 12 March 2021. Latest assessment published 8 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Devon County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Comfort Home Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Comfort Home Care.
When was Comfort Home Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Comfort Home Care was published on 8 October 2026.
Who runs Comfort Home Care?
Comfort Home Care is run by Mrs Victoria Burston.
What is Comfort Home Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01884 251555
Address
Sunningmead Community Centre, Lazenby Road, Tiverton, EX16 4AL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Easy Living Care Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. –
    Encounter Live-In Care Devon Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  3. –
    Anglo Support and Housing Ltd Not yet rated, 4.5 miles away
  4. G
    Dedicated Care Good, 4.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Dependable Care Services Limited Requires improvement, 4.8 miles away

See all home care services in Devon