Rated Care Homes

Caremark Kensington

Home care, Kensington and Chelsea

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Caremark Kensington: inspection record

Home care, Kensington and Chelsea

Rated Requires improvement in September 2025, down from Good.

Caremark Kensington: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 2 times since 2018. Rated Good in 2018, then Requires improvement in September 2025.

Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published 13 months ago.

How it compares locally

  • The only Requires improvement home care service in Kensington and Chelsea, out of 11 with a rating.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 September 2025 (assessment visit 1 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.

Date of assessment: 5 June to 5 August 2025. At the time of our assessment 61 people were using the service, 54 of whom were receiving support with personal care, including some people with a learning disability and autistic people.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the provider was meeting the principles of Right support, right care, right culture.

The last rating for this service was good (report published 20 October 2018). We carried out this assessment because the service had not been inspected for a long time. We looked at all the quality statements and the overall rating for this service has changed to requires improvement.

We found the service was in breach of 2 regulations of the Health and Social Care Act (2014)in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance.

The call monitoring logs contained irregularities, including missed and or delayed visits. There was poor management and oversight of staff deployment and a consistent lack of time for staff to travel between home visits. Some people did not receive their care and support as and when planned. Medicines were not always administered and managed in accordance with the instructions from the prescriber, nor in line with people’s risk management plans. Governance systems failed to identify some of the concerns we found during this assessment and, where the provider had identified shortfalls, effective action to make improvements was not being completed in a timely manner or sustained.

Whilst concerns were found on this inspection, the service had recently passed to new owners, who were committed to making improvements. They agreed to provide us with an action plan to demonstrate how they intend to achieve this.

The provider followed robust recruitment procedures and staff were trained and supported well. People had their needs assessed and support packages were compiled to meet their individual requirements. People were supported to live healthy and safe lifestyles and to access healthcare professionals as needed. Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act and made sure people consented to their care and support. People were supported in the least restrictive way possible and had maximum choice and control of their lives. Managers carried out regular spot checks and audits. People were supported to make a complaint if needed and they were listened to and responded to appropriately. People were involved in all aspects of their care and support. Staff encouraged people to do as much for themselves as possible. Information was accessible and available to people in a format suitable for their communication needs. Equality and diversity were promoted and respected for everyone.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation 12 in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, because of concerns with staff deployment and the ways people’s medicines were managed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation 17 in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  • Safe was rated Requires improvement on 24 September 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  • Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 24 September 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Contact and registration details

Details for Caremark Kensington
AddressUnit 6, Shaftesbury Centre, 85 Barlby Road, London, W10 6BN
Phone020 3621 2253
Websitewww.caremark.co.uk/locations/kensinton-chelsea-westminster
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
  • Children 0-18 years
  • Dementia
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • People who misuse drugs and alcohol
  • People with an eating disorder
  • Physical Disability
  • Sensory Impairment
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 1 inspection report, latest 20 October 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 24 September 2025; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Caremark Kensington
ProviderA.I. Care Services LtdBrand: Caremark
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number10176631 (opens Companies House)

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Hope Care Agency Home care, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    Ivy Homecare Services Limited Home care, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  3. –
    Equal People Mencap Home care, 0.3 miles away
    No overall rating
  4. G
    Healthvision UK Ltd - North Kensington Home care, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  5. G
    Sabir Care UK Ltd Home care, 0.7 miles away
    Good

See all home care in Kensington and Chelsea

Getting help from Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Kensington and Chelsea shares its adult social care information directory, People First, with Westminster City Council.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Caremark Kensington provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Caremark Kensington.
When was Caremark Kensington last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Caremark Kensington was published on 24 September 2025.
Who runs Caremark Kensington?
Caremark Kensington is run by A.I. Care Services Ltd.
What is Caremark Kensington's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 24 September 2025.