Rated Care Homes

A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 49 of 65

    rated home care services in Coventry are rated Good, like this one.

A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited: inspection record

Home care, Coventry

Rated Good in September 2026.

A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Amicale Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Arden Grove Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Hereward College Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Home Instead Coventry South Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Like Care Limited Good, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Coventry

See all home care services in Tile Hill

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 September 2026 (assessment visit 1 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

AL Enablement Services (Care Support) Limited is registered to provide domiciliary services to people living in their own homes in the community. There were 57 people using the service at the time of the assessment of which 28 were receiving a regulated activity.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

AL Enablement Services (Care Support) Limited is registered to provide domiciliary care services to older people, younger adults, dementia, mental health, sensory impairment and physical disability.

We carried out this assessment on 9 September to 23 September. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

The inspection found that people received safe, person-centred care from a caring and committed staff team. People and their relatives consistently told us they felt safe, valued the continuity of care provided, and were positive about the reliability, communication and responsiveness of the service. Staff were described as kind, compassionate and knowledgeable, and people felt involved in decisions about their care. Care plans and risk assessments were detailed and personalised, providing staff with clear guidance to meet people's individual needs, preferences, cultural requirements and communication needs. Evidence demonstrated that people received care in line with their assessed needs, with flexibility provided when circumstances changed.

People were supported by enough staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. Risks were assessed and people were involved in the process. There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse. Medicines were administered safely and there were systems in place to ensure the environment was safe.

There was evidence of effective recruitment processes, good oversight of incidents and accidents, and positive partnership working with families and healthcare professionals. Staff spoke positively about the support they received from management and described a culture focused on delivering high-quality care and achieving positive outcomes for people. Relatives and staff consistently described management as visible, approachable and responsive, with senior leaders providing support and guidance to the registered manager.

People received care that was flexible and responsive to changes in their needs, including following hospital admissions and periods of increased support. However, some governance arrangements required further strengthening to ensure sustained oversight and continuous improvement. Areas identified included implementing more robust systems to monitor safeguarding notifications, strengthening oversight of staff supervision and appraisal processes, increasing opportunities for staff engagement through regular meetings, formalising the recording of lessons learned, and developing clearer systems to record and review complaints, compliments and comments. In addition, some anomalies identified within electronic call monitoring records required further review to ensure they accurately reflected care delivery. During the assessment, we made the registered manager aware of their responsibility to notify CQC of notifiable incidents and safeguarding events in line with regulatory requirements, as not all safeguarding referrals had been submitted to CQC. The provider had already developed an action plan to address the areas identified during the assessment and demonstrated an understanding of the improvements required.

The provider had a recent change in ownership, this provided further assurances regarding the sustainability of the service, with the new owners committing investment to support governance, operational development and service improvements. This investment, alongside the provider's proactive response to the findings of this assessment, provides a positive foundation for continued improvement and the maintenance of good outcomes for people using the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Janice Malosti
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 27 November 2018. Latest assessment published 30 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10414086 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Coventry City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited.
When was A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited was published on 30 September 2026.
Who runs A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited?
A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited is run by A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited.
What is A & L Enablement Services (Care & Support) Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 September 2026.

Contact

Address
Unit 20 West Park, 211 Torrington Avenue, Coventry, CV4 9AP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Amicale Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Arden Grove Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Hereward College Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Home Instead Coventry South Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Like Care Limited Good, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Coventry

See all home care services in Tile Hill