Angelica Care Ltd
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2017
- West Sussex, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.
1 month
since the latest rating was published.
125 of 138
rated home care services in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.
Angelica Care Ltd: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Shaftesbury Ashley Place Good, 2.2 miles away
- G Vitale Care Chichester Good, 2.3 miles away
- G Avoston Ltd Good, 2.4 miles away
- G Choice Care 4 U Services Ltd Good, 2.4 miles away
- G L'Arche Bognor Regis Good, 2.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 September 2026 (assessment visit 21 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service
Angelica Care Ltd is a home care service, providing support and personal care to people in their own homes.
Who the service is for
This service supports older people and people with physical disabilities who are living in their own homes.
Key findings
We carried out this assessment on 6 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.
People were kept safe by knowledgeable staff who had access to systems and processes to manage care safely. Care plans were recorded on an electronic system which was accessible by staff via mobile phones. The management team were in the process of changing to a new system to improve accessibility and better connectivity for real time updates. Senior staff assessed risk when people started using the service, carrying out meetings with people and families. Staff continued to report any change to risk during visits, for example environmental risks. A staff member told us, “We look out for risk all the time, and if we see anything we will call the office and they will speak to the family or social services to get it fixed.” Staff were well trained and knew people well, all the staff we spoke to were confident people who used the service were safe. Staff told us if they called the office, the response was quick and effective. Staff understood who to contact in the event of an emergency, and the service reported safeguarding concerns appropriately. People were encouraged to manage their own medicine needs where possible, to maintain independence, however if necessary staff were trained to administer medicines, or assist people with their medicines.
People had person centred care plans which were tailored for individuals. Initial assessments were carried out by senior staff and included any relevant health care professional’s input such as occupational therapists. Staff were trained in treating people with dignity and respect and told us how they frequently checked for consent during care.
People and their families were involved in the creation of the care plan and any changes needed. People were encouraged to remain as independent as possible, and staff were able to assist people to go out and visit local areas or shops to ensure people were not isolated.
Staff were well trained. They told us, “There is an abundance of training.” Some training was via an online portal, but staff were also trained in person for relevant issues such as moving and handling of people or first aid. Staff told us they had training in the equipment they used.
Staff told us the service was good. They said they knew the senior staff and that staff in the office were responsive when called for information. Some staff said that they found travel time between calls could be shorter than necessary, but they were usually able to manage their timetable. Staff told us they were asked for their opinions about the service at supervisions and via staff surveys. Staff said the training was good and they felt confident in their roles. The registered manager told us that diversity in the workforce was a strength and they endeavoured to match staff to people to help with companionship as well as care.
The registered manager was well supported by the provider and a deputy manager. Office based administration staff were knowledgeable about the people the service supported, and they also provided care to people occasionally to ensure this knowledge was practical as well as theoretical.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 17 May 2018. Latest assessment published 29 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Angelica Care Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 10398027 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from West Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at West Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01243 642121, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: West Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Angelica Care Ltd provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Angelica Care Ltd.
- When was Angelica Care Ltd last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Angelica Care Ltd was published on 29 September 2026.
- Who runs Angelica Care Ltd?
- Angelica Care Ltd is run by Angelica Care Ltd.
- What is Angelica Care Ltd's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 September 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01243 859876
- Address
- 1 & 2 The Parade, Pagham, Bognor Regis, PO21 4TW Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Shaftesbury Ashley Place Good, 2.2 miles away
- G Vitale Care Chichester Good, 2.3 miles away
- G Avoston Ltd Good, 2.4 miles away
- G Choice Care 4 U Services Ltd Good, 2.4 miles away
- G L'Arche Bognor Regis Good, 2.5 miles away