Rated Care Homes

Avoston Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 125 of 138

    rated home care services in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Avoston Ltd: inspection record

Home care, West Sussex

Rated Good in November 2019.

Avoston Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 27 November 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Avoston Limited is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people living in their own homes. It currently provides a service to older adults with a range of care and support needs. At the time of inspection, since this is a new service, only a few people were supported in the Chichester area. There were plans to expand the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

People were protected from the risk of abuse and harm by staff who had been trained appropriately and knew what action to take if they had any concerns. Risks to people had been identified and assessed, with guidance for staff on what actions to take, which was followed. People told us that staff were rarely late when visiting their homes and, if they were going to be late, they would be informed. New staff were recruited safely. Some people required staff to administer or prompt them to take their medicines; this was completed in a safe way. People's needs were regularly reviewed to ensure the service they received was suitable.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Before people received support from the service, the registered manager undertook assessments of people's needs. People and their relatives were involved in discussions. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff completed a range of training which was relevant to their roles and specific to meet people's needs. They received regular supervision from the registered manager.

People were supported to eat and drink in a healthy way and staff prepared meals for people. One relative told us that their family member's appetite had increased because staff had encouraged them with eating. Support staff could accompany people to healthcare appointments if required. People received support from community nurses, GPs, and other health and social care professionals.

People told us that staff were kind and caring. People's diverse needs were identified and catered for and care was delivered in a personalised way that met people's preferences. People were treated with dignity and respect.

Care plans were drawn-up with people and their relatives and provided detailed information about people's personal histories as well as their care and support needs, which staff followed. People's communication needs had been identified, so that staff communicated with them in a way that suited them. At the time of

inspection, no complaints had been received, but the registered manager said that any complaints would be managed in line with the provider's policy.

People and their relatives spoke highly of the service and of the registered manager and support staff. Their feedback was obtained at regular reviews and the registered manager maintained regular contact with people.

A range of audits had been implemented to measure and monitor the quality of the service and to drive improvement. Staff felt supported by the registered manager and the registered manager had regular contact with the provider. The service worked in partnership with others.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kerry Duley
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 27 November 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Avoston Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10514151 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Avoston Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Avoston Ltd.
When was Avoston Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Avoston Ltd was published on 27 November 2019.
Who runs Avoston Ltd?
Avoston Ltd is run by Avoston Ltd.
What is Avoston Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 November 2019.