Rated Care Homes

Superb Healthcare

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 8 of 29

    rated home care services in Reading are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Superb Healthcare: inspection record

Home care, Reading

Rated Requires improvement in May 2023, down from Good.

Superb Healthcare: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Panacea Care Services (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Charles Clore Court Extra Care Sheltered Housing (Good, 1.4 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. RI
    Ivy Care (Reading & Newbury) Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Panacea Care Services Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. RI
    The Meadway Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  4. –
    Pentland Close No overall rating, 1.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Reading

See all home care services in Tilehurst

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 3 May 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Superb Healthcare is a domiciliary care agency. The service provides support to older people, younger adults, people living with physical disability, dementia, mental health needs, sensory impairment and the misuse of drugs and alcohol. Staff provide personal care to people living in their own homes and supported living settings. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection 18 people using the service were receiving personal care, supported by 28 staff.

What inspectors found

The provider could not provide required documentation to demonstrate there were enough staff to meet people's needs safely. Whilst staff always sought consent before delivering people's care, records did not show consent to their care had been sought in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act. Care plans did not contain required information in line with the Equality Act 2010, to enable staff to provide person-centred care. Records did not demonstrate people and relatives' involvement in their care planning. The registered manager had not identified breaches of regulation in relation to staffing, the need for consent and person- centred care planning, which exposed people to potential risk of harm.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice.

People were protected from avoidable harm and experienced safe care from suitably recruited staff, who had been trained to recognise different types of abuse. Staff promoted people's independence whilst effectively mitigating risks to keep them safe. People were supported to take their prescribed medicines safely by staff who prompted and reminded them, in line with their medicines support plans. People were protected from the risk of infections because staff delivered care in accordance with the provider's infection prevention and control policy. The management team analysed accidents and incidents to identify and implement required learning.

People's needs were assessed before they received care to ensure their support needs could be met by the service. People experienced care and support from staff who had been enabled to develop and maintain skills relevant to their role. Staff supported people to eat and drink enough to protect them from the risks associated with malnutrition and dehydration. Staff worked effectively with other health care professionals to effectively access health care services and live healthier lives.

People experienced caring, meaningful relationships with staff who consistently treated them with kindness and compassion. Most people and relatives felt valued by the service and that their opinion mattered. People were treated with dignity by staff who respected their privacy and embraced their diversity and

individuality.

The management team promoted a positive culture within the service, where people and staff felt valued, focused on delivering good care. The registered and deputy managers were proactive and responsive, ensuring the service achieved good outcomes for people, their relatives and staff. The management team assumed responsibility when mistakes had been made and understood their responsibilities to inform people when things went wrong. Staff experienced good support from the management team, who were readily available to provide guidance. Staff felt comfortable to voice concerns, which they were confident would be addressed. The service collaborated effectively with other agencies, including occupational therapists, hospital discharge teams, social workers and other care providers to ensure people experienced good outcomes.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 May 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 3 May 2023. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 3 May 2023. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 May 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Peter Mukabi
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 3 May 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08863104 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Reading Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Superb Healthcare provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Superb Healthcare.
When was Superb Healthcare last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Superb Healthcare was published on 3 May 2023.
Who runs Superb Healthcare?
Superb Healthcare is run by Superb Healthcare Limited.
What is Superb Healthcare's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 May 2023.

Contact

Address
30 Norcot Road, Tilehurst, Reading, RG30 6BU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Panacea Care Services (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Charles Clore Court Extra Care Sheltered Housing (Good, 1.4 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. RI
    Ivy Care (Reading & Newbury) Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Panacea Care Services Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. RI
    The Meadway Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  4. –
    Pentland Close No overall rating, 1.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Reading

See all home care services in Tilehurst