Rated Care Homes

Embark Head Office

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 32 of 37

    rated home care services in Brighton and Hove are rated Good, like this one.

Embark Head Office: inspection record

Home care, Brighton and Hove

Rated Good in September 2018.

Embark Head Office: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Casgo Care Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Bright Care East & Mid Sussex Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Hanover Care Limited Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Alpha May Care First Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Dynasty Brighton Branch (Domiciliary Care) Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all home care services in Brighton and Hove

See all home care services in Central Brighton and Hove

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 5 September 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The inspection took place on 2 and 3 August 2018 and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours' notice because the location provides a care at home service. We wanted to be sure that someone would be in to speak with us.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Embark Head Office provides care and support to people living in two 'supported living' settings, so that they can live as independently as possible. People's care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people's personal care and support.

At the last inspection on 25 and 26 November 2015, the service was rated as good in the areas of Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the overall rating of Good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

Staff had a good understanding of systems in place to manage medicines. People were supported to receive their medicines safely. Staffing levels were sufficient to ensure people's wellbeing and safety was protected. A robust recruitment and selection process was also in place. This ensured prospective new staff have the right skills and were suitable to work with people living in the home.

People and relatives were provided with information and guidance to access other services which were relevant to them for any on-going support they may need. Staff considered peoples capacity using the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) as guidance. People's capacity to make decisions had been assessed. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff continued to receive regular training and updates to have the right skills and knowledge to be able to meet people's assessed needs. Staff had regular spot checks, supervisions and appraisals to help them to understand their roles and responsibilities.

Staff remained kind and caring and had developed good relationships with people. Relatives told us their loved ones were comfortable in the presence of staff. Relatives confirmed staff were caring and looked after people well. People were provided with the care, support and equipment they needed to stay independent in their homes.

People's individual needs continued to be assessed and detailed care plans were developed to identify what care and support they required. People and relatives were consulted about their care to ensure wishes, aspiration, needs and preferences were met.

Quality assurance and information governance systems remained in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service. Relatives all told us that they were happy with the service provided and the way it was managed.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Victoire Holder
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 5 September 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Embark Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07161110 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Brighton and Hove City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Embark Head Office provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Embark Head Office.
When was Embark Head Office last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Embark Head Office was published on 5 September 2018.
Who runs Embark Head Office?
Embark Head Office is run by Embark Ltd.
What is Embark Head Office's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 September 2018.