Rated Care Homes

Meadow Court

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 94%

    of rated home care services in Somerset are Good or Outstanding (91% across the South West, 88% across England).

Meadow Court: inspection record

Home care, Somerset

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Meadow Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: One Love Home Care - Main Office (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Mass Home Care (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    House of St Martin No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    BlueWave Care LTD Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    One Love Home Care - Main Office Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Mass Home Care Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Ash House Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Somerset

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 July 2025 (assessment visit 10 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment was carried out between 1July and 7 July 2025. We visited the service on 1 and 2 July 2025.

Meadow Court is a domiciliary agency which provides care and support to people living in their own accommodation in a supported living complex on the outskirts of Taunton. At the time of the inspection visits 5 people were using the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service specialised in the care of people with a learning disability and autistic people.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

At the last inspection the service was in breach of regulation relating to good governance. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the service was no longer in breach of this regulation. There were now effective systems in place to monitor quality and plan ongoing improvements.

There was a clear staffing structure which made sure there was always senior staff available to people and to support less experienced staff.

People were safe at the service and staff knew how to report any concerns. The registered manager liaised with appropriate professionals when issues arose to make sure people were protected from avoidable harm.

Staff were safely recruited and received training appropriate to their role. Staff felt well supported.

Risks were assessed to ensure people could receive care and support safely and take part in activities with minimum risk to themselves or others.

People had their needs fully assessed and staff provided care and support in line with their assessed needs. The registered manager tried to involve people in their care as much as possible. At the time of the inspection, they were working with outside professionals to look at ways to further seek people’s views and make sure they were involved in decisions.

The staff worked well with other professionals to make sure people’s needs, including their healthcare needs, were met. Professionals who worked with the people [OG1][JP2]who used the service told us the staff always provided care and support in accordance with their recommendations.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Martin Priddle
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 2 February 2023. Latest assessment published 30 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Meadow Court provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Meadow Court.
When was Meadow Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Meadow Court was published on 30 July 2025.
Who runs Meadow Court?
Meadow Court is run by Mr Frederick John Eaton.
What is Meadow Court's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
01823 270845
Address
Minehead Road, Taunton, TA2 6NS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: One Love Home Care - Main Office (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Mass Home Care (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    House of St Martin No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    BlueWave Care LTD Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    One Love Home Care - Main Office Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Mass Home Care Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Ash House Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Somerset