Rated Care Homes

Ryedale Homecare

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 110 of 126

    rated home care services in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Ryedale Homecare: inspection record

Home care, North Yorkshire

Rated Good in August 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Ryedale Homecare: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Eldercare Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Vale of York Intermediate Care service Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Deansfield Court Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Acorn Community Care Good, 2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in North Yorkshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 August 2026 (assessment visit 24 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 7 July 2026. Ryedale Homecare is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to older people and younger adults, including people living with dementia and people with a learning disability, in their own homes. This assessment was undertaken to review regulatory compliance and improvements made following the provider's previous assessment, where a warning notice was issued, and the provider was in breach of regulations relating to governance. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were protected from avoidable harm through improved systems for monitoring risk, care delivery, and staff performance. Care plans and risk assessments were detailed, regularly reviewed, and reflected people's individual needs and preferences. Staff received appropriate training, supervision, and competency assessments to support the delivery of safe and effective care. Medicines were managed safely, and people received coordinated support from healthcare professionals when their needs changed.

People were supported by caring staff who treated them with dignity and respect and involved them in decisions about their care. Care planning reflected people's strengths, wishes, and desired outcomes. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

At the previous assessment, governance systems had not effectively identified and addressed concerns relating to care records, risk management and oversight of care delivery. During this assessment, we found significant improvements had been made. Leaders had implemented effective quality assurance and auditing systems which provided oversight of care delivery, records, risks and staff practice. The provider demonstrated that actions taken in response to the enforcement action had been embedded and sustained.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people's care,treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people's outcomes were consistently good, and people's feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people's needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people's needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Amy Lightfoot
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 29 October 2022. Latest assessment published 3 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05172111 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ryedale Homecare provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Ryedale Homecare.
When was Ryedale Homecare last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ryedale Homecare was published on 3 August 2026.
Who runs Ryedale Homecare?
Ryedale Homecare is run by Ryedale Homecare Limited.
What is Ryedale Homecare's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01653 699360
Address
5A Welham Road, Norton, Malton, YO17 9DP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Eldercare Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Vale of York Intermediate Care service Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Deansfield Court Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Acorn Community Care Good, 2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in North Yorkshire