Rated Care Homes

Vale of York Intermediate Care service

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 126

    rated home care services in North Yorkshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Vale of York Intermediate Care service: inspection record

Home care, North Yorkshire

Rated Requires improvement in May 2026, down from Good.

Vale of York Intermediate Care service: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Eldercare (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Ryedale Homecare (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Eldercare Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Ryedale Homecare Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Deansfield Court Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Acorn Community Care Good, 1.8 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in North Yorkshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 May 2026 (assessment visit 9 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of the assessment: 16 February to 31 March 2026. The Vale of York Intermediate Care Service is a domiciliary service which provides short-term personal care support to people living in their own homes. At the time of the assessment 11 people were receiving support with their personal care.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have assessed the service against ‘right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

We found a breach of regulation in relation to good governance. Effective systems were not in place to assess the quality and safety of the service and to drive improvement. This included the absence of risk management plans and records to support the safe administration of medicines.

However, people were protected from abuse. Staff understood the need to escalate any concerns and how to do this. Staff were reliable and knowledgeable, taking the time to get to know people. Staff completed medicines training and their competency to safely administer these was assessed.

The staff team worked well together and shared information appropriately with health and social care professionals. People were asked what they wanted to achieve and the support was tailored accordingly.

People described their experience of the care provided as really positive, noting staff were kind and caring in their approach and considered their dignity. People’s independence and choice was actively promoted. Staff confirmed they felt well supported in their role noting the registered manager was approachable and compassionate.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. The systems did not promote high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the governance of the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 7 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 7 May 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Debra Wharrick
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 17 October 2017. Latest assessment published 7 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
North Yorkshire CouncilBrand: North Yorkshire County Council
Ownership type
Organisation

North Yorkshire Council runs 30 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 29 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by North Yorkshire Council

  1. G
    5 Whitby Road Care Home Good. Care home, North Yorkshire
  2. G
    Ashfield (Skipton) Good. Care home, North Yorkshire
  3. G
    Benkhill Lodge Good. Care home, North Yorkshire
  4. G
    Carentan House Good. Care home, North Yorkshire

See all 30 services run by North Yorkshire Council

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Vale of York Intermediate Care service provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Vale of York Intermediate Care service.
When was Vale of York Intermediate Care service last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Vale of York Intermediate Care service was published on 7 May 2026.
Who runs Vale of York Intermediate Care service?
Vale of York Intermediate Care service is run by North Yorkshire Council. It runs 30 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Vale of York Intermediate Care service's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 7 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01609 536586
Address
Old Malton Road, Malton, YO17 7HH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Eldercare (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Ryedale Homecare (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Eldercare Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Ryedale Homecare Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Deansfield Court Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Acorn Community Care Good, 1.8 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in North Yorkshire