Rated Care Homes

Royle Care Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 29

    rated home care services in Reading are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Royle Care Limited: inspection record

Home care, Reading

Rated Requires improvement in November 2025, down from Good.

Royle Care Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Creative Support - Berkshire & Oxfordshire Services (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and New Support Solutions (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    New Support Solutions Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Respect Care Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  4. RI
    NK Care Limited Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    Shon Medical Services - Main Office Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away

See all home care services in Reading

See all home care services in Central Reading

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 November 2025 (assessment visit 18 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 23rd July 2025 to September 5th, 2025. The service is a Domiciliary Care Agency registered to provide personal care. People were supported with their personal care needs to enable them to live in their own homes and promote their independence. We carried out a responsive assessment to consider concerns raised in relation to late, missed calls, carer behaviour and lack of responsiveness to complaints. We found the provider in breach of 2 legal regulations relating to complaints and informing CQC of events they were required to notify to us.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of the inspection the service supported 43 people with personal care. The service provided safe care, and people were protected from the risk of abuse. Staff understood and managed risks. Staff were recruited safely, were appropriately trained and received support and supervision. People’s needs were assessed taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. People were supported to be independent and have choice and control over their lives. People were treated as individuals and staff treated them with kindness, compassion, and dignity. Medicines were managed safely. People received their medicines as prescribed by staff who were trained and assessed as competent to do so.

The service monitored people’s health and took action to share any concerns with the wider multidisciplinary teams as required. People were treated as individuals and staff treated them with kindness, compassion, and dignity.

Several people told us that staff were sometimes late to their calls and that they were not always contacted by the office to let tell them know the carer would be late and sometimes staff did not stay the entire length of the call. This feedback was given to the provider who put in place measures to increase the monitoring of the electronic call monitoring system. This will inform the office if a carer has not logged on at a call within 30 minutes of the allocated call time. The provider also increased the number of unannounced checks of care calls to monitor the quality of the care and the length of time the staff member is at the call. We found no evidence of missed calls.

The provider had quality monitoring systems in place, but they lacked detailed information to identify themes and drive improvement. The provider was in the process of developing more robust and detailed auditing tools. The provider was not always knowledgeable about their regulatory responsibilities regarding submitting notifications to the CQC and did not always submit notifications to the CQC when required. Some people told us that when they had made a complaint, they did not receive a response within the timescales of the providers complaints policy and they had not received a full response to their complaint. The provider incidents and safeguarding records showed limited details of the investigation, actions taken, outcome and lessons learnt.

The registered manager was visible and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. People were supported by staff who felt valued by the management team.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the findings and to enable us to monitor the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to the management and response to complaints.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to, governance at the service as they did not always carry out their regulatory requirement to notify the CQC of reportable events. A notification is information about important events which the provider is required to send us by law.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 10 November 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 10 November 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ben Royle
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 5 February 2021. Latest assessment published 10 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08311745 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Reading Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Royle Care Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Royle Care Limited.
When was Royle Care Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Royle Care Limited was published on 10 November 2025.
Who runs Royle Care Limited?
Royle Care Limited is run by Royle Care Limited.
What is Royle Care Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 10 November 2025.

Contact

Address
The Annex, 121 London Street, Reading, RG1 4QA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Creative Support - Berkshire & Oxfordshire Services (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and New Support Solutions (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    New Support Solutions Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Respect Care Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  4. RI
    NK Care Limited Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    Shon Medical Services - Main Office Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away

See all home care services in Reading

See all home care services in Central Reading