Royle Care Limited
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2013
- Central Reading, Reading, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
8 of 29
rated home care services in Reading are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Royle Care Limited: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in November 2025, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Creative Support - Berkshire & Oxfordshire Services (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and New Support Solutions (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Creative Support - Berkshire & Oxfordshire Services Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G New Support Solutions Good, 0.1 miles away
- – Respect Care Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
- RI NK Care Limited Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- – Shon Medical Services - Main Office Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 November 2025 (assessment visit 18 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 23rd July 2025 to September 5th, 2025. The service is a Domiciliary Care Agency registered to provide personal care. People were supported with their personal care needs to enable them to live in their own homes and promote their independence. We carried out a responsive assessment to consider concerns raised in relation to late, missed calls, carer behaviour and lack of responsiveness to complaints. We found the provider in breach of 2 legal regulations relating to complaints and informing CQC of events they were required to notify to us.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At the time of the inspection the service supported 43 people with personal care. The service provided safe care, and people were protected from the risk of abuse. Staff understood and managed risks. Staff were recruited safely, were appropriately trained and received support and supervision. People’s needs were assessed taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. People were supported to be independent and have choice and control over their lives. People were treated as individuals and staff treated them with kindness, compassion, and dignity. Medicines were managed safely. People received their medicines as prescribed by staff who were trained and assessed as competent to do so.
The service monitored people’s health and took action to share any concerns with the wider multidisciplinary teams as required. People were treated as individuals and staff treated them with kindness, compassion, and dignity.
Several people told us that staff were sometimes late to their calls and that they were not always contacted by the office to let tell them know the carer would be late and sometimes staff did not stay the entire length of the call. This feedback was given to the provider who put in place measures to increase the monitoring of the electronic call monitoring system. This will inform the office if a carer has not logged on at a call within 30 minutes of the allocated call time. The provider also increased the number of unannounced checks of care calls to monitor the quality of the care and the length of time the staff member is at the call. We found no evidence of missed calls.
The provider had quality monitoring systems in place, but they lacked detailed information to identify themes and drive improvement. The provider was in the process of developing more robust and detailed auditing tools. The provider was not always knowledgeable about their regulatory responsibilities regarding submitting notifications to the CQC and did not always submit notifications to the CQC when required. Some people told us that when they had made a complaint, they did not receive a response within the timescales of the providers complaints policy and they had not received a full response to their complaint. The provider incidents and safeguarding records showed limited details of the investigation, actions taken, outcome and lessons learnt.
The registered manager was visible and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. People were supported by staff who felt valued by the management team.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the findings and to enable us to monitor the service.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to the management and response to complaints.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to, governance at the service as they did not always carry out their regulatory requirement to notify the CQC of reportable events. A notification is information about important events which the provider is required to send us by law.
Questions to ask the service
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 10 November 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 10 November 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Ben Royle
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)4 inspection reports, latest 5 February 2021. Latest assessment published 10 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Royle Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 08311745 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Reading Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Reading Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0118 937 3747
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Reading Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Royle Care Limited provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Royle Care Limited.
- When was Royle Care Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Royle Care Limited was published on 10 November 2025.
- Who runs Royle Care Limited?
- Royle Care Limited is run by Royle Care Limited.
- What is Royle Care Limited's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 10 November 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 0118 957 7460
- Address
- The Annex, 121 London Street, Reading, RG1 4QA Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Creative Support - Berkshire & Oxfordshire Services (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and New Support Solutions (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Creative Support - Berkshire & Oxfordshire Services Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G New Support Solutions Good, 0.1 miles away
- – Respect Care Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
- RI NK Care Limited Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- – Shon Medical Services - Main Office Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away