Rated Care Homes

Diversity Social Care Ltd

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 82%

    of rated home care services in Leicester are Good or Outstanding (85% across the East Midlands, 88% across England).

Diversity Social Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Leicester

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Diversity Social Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluewood Healthcare (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Lansdowne House - Leicester (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Bluewood Healthcare Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Anstey Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Jacaranda Care Solutions Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Lansdowne House - Leicester Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Leicester

See all home care services in Central Leicester

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 July 2025 (assessment visit 15 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 29 May – 9 June 2025. The service provides care at home; providing support to older and younger adults, people with physical disabilities, people living with dementia and children with learning and/or physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection the service was supporting 14 adults and children who were in receipt of the regulated activity, personal care. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

During this assessment, we identified a breach of regulation in good governance. At our last inspection, we found the provider had made improvements to records and governance, but improvements needed time to be fully embedded in practices. At this assessment we found some improvements had been sustained but there was no systematic approach to plan to identify and maintain on-going improvements. Limited audits and quality checks had been implemented which meant the provider did not have a holistic picture of what needed to be done going forward. Although staff told us they felt supported by the provider, there was a lack of up-to-date guidance in relation to people’s care needs, and risks associated with these, and records were not updated when changes were made to people’s care. People and their relatives told us, although they were fully involved in decisions about their care, they were not involved in developing their care records and were unsure of the content of their care plans. There was a lack of monitoring regarding how best practice and the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) were put into practice, including best interest processes. The provider responded promptly to these concerns and gave assurances regarding how improvements would be made and sustained going forward.

Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and felt supported within their roles. Staff demonstrated they clearly understood the provider’s values of providing personalised care. People were supported by a consistent staff team who had the right skills, qualifications and experience to meet their needs. Staff understood and managed risks to keep people safe, including assisting people with medicines.People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing. Leaders and staff worked with people, their families and other agencies to enable people to achieve the best possible outcomes from their care.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment of this key question for this service. This key question has been rated as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment of this key question for this service. This key question has been rated as good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment of this key question for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection, the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the management oversight of the service and the failure to ensure records were up to date and relevant to the support people were receiving.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 2 October 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Frida Kusamba
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 13 January 2021. Latest assessment published 29 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11619605 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Leicester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Diversity Social Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Diversity Social Care Ltd.
When was Diversity Social Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Diversity Social Care Ltd was published on 29 July 2025.
Who runs Diversity Social Care Ltd?
Diversity Social Care Ltd is run by Diversity Social Care Ltd.
What is Diversity Social Care Ltd's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07508 516254
Address
89A London Road, Leicester, LE2 0PF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluewood Healthcare (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Lansdowne House - Leicester (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Bluewood Healthcare Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Anstey Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Jacaranda Care Solutions Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Lansdowne House - Leicester Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Leicester

See all home care services in Central Leicester