Respectful Care
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2019
- Greasbrough, Rotherham, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.
9 months
since the latest rating was published.
29 of 36
rated home care services in Rotherham are rated Good, like this one.
Respectful Care: inspection record
Rated Good in January 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G CRT - Rotherham Home Care Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Careline Homecare (Rotherham) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Comfort Call Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Hales Group Limited - Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Human Support Group - Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 January 2026 (assessment visit 12 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 18 November 2025 to 17 December 2025. This service is a domiciliary care service registered to provide personal care for people living in their own homes in the community. They provide support to people with a range of different needs including older people, people with dementia and people with physical disabilities. At the time of the assessment 70 people were using the service who were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. Not everyone who uses a domiciliary service receives personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not used by anyone with a primary need of learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under our specialist guidance ‘Right support, right care, right culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group. This provider was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.
We rated this service under our previous methodology in November 2021 where it was inspected and rated as good overall. At this assessment we reviewed all 5 key questions and rated the provider good overall.
Care records were completed in collaboration with people and their relatives. People felt included in decisions around their care. Care plans included person-centred details about people needs and included people’s areas of interest and history.
Staff received training to support them to do their jobs well. Staff were encouraged and supported to develop in their roles and opportunities to take on more responsibility were available for staff who wanted to do so. Staff felt valued in their roles and spoke positively about working for the service. Recruitment was completed safely with pre-employment checks taking place in line with current requirements.
Policies and processes were in place to keep people safe from harm. Staff were training in safeguarding and understood their role and responsibilities in relation to this. Records evidenced that where concerns for a person’s safety were identified, this information was quickly passed on to the relevant services.
People were treated kindly by staff who knew them well and respected their choices for care. People and staff felt supported by the management team at the service.
Managers completed regular audits and governance of the service to ensure care was delivered safely and to identify and address issues quickly.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Julie Connelly
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 9 December 2021. Latest assessment published 22 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- GCM Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 10608342 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01709 822330
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Respectful Care provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Respectful Care.
- When was Respectful Care last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Respectful Care was published on 22 January 2026.
- Who runs Respectful Care?
- Respectful Care is run by GCM Care Limited.
- What is Respectful Care's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 January 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 07515 362627
- Address
- Unit B6, Taylors Court, Parkgate, Rotherham, S62 6NU Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G CRT - Rotherham Home Care Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Careline Homecare (Rotherham) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Comfort Call Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Hales Group Limited - Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Human Support Group - Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away