Rated Care Homes

PSA Home Care Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 22 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 123 of 162

    rated home care services in Birmingham are rated Good, like this one.

PSA Home Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Birmingham

Rated Good in December 2024.

PSA Home Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Victorious Living Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Bournville Gardens Village Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. RI
    Linday Office Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. –
    Faith & Hope Ltd Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham

See all home care services in Harborne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 December 2024 (assessment visit 1 August 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 12 September to 17 October 2024.

PSA Home Care Ltd is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive a regulated activity of personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. 23 people were receiving personal care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The assessment was prompted by a review of information we held about the service. At the time of our assessment commenced, the service had only been delivering personal care since 18 August 2024, following an extended break in provision. Therefore, we were unable to assess how well the provider’s systems and processes had been embedded and how successfully they operated over time.

The provider had robust safeguarding procedures in place to protect people from abuse and neglect and took steps to ensure staff under their associated responsibilities. People were provided with accessible information on safeguarding and knew how to raise any related concerns. People and, where appropriate, their relatives were fully involved in the assessment of risks. Staff were provided with information and guidance on how to manage risks and they reported any changes in risk to the provider. The provider followed safe recruitment practices to ensure prospective staff were suitable to work with people. Staff received a structured induction, followed by ongoing training, supervision and support to ensure they were able to fulfil their roles. People’s care plans were person-centred and placed emphasis on promoting people’s rights and independence. The provider took steps to avoid discrimination and to ensure people’s equity in experience and outcomes. Robust governance systems and quality assurance were in place, designed to enable the provider to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service provided.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Our rating for this key question remains good. People’s safety was a priority in the service. Robust safeguarding procedures were in place to protect people from abuse and neglect. Incidents, accidents, complaints, concerns and people’s feedback were monitored on an ongoing basis to identify risks, areas for improvement and ensure learning was shared. Risks were assessed, reviewed and managed with people and, where appropriate, their relatives. The punctuality and duration of people’s care calls was monitored to ensure they received a consistent and reliable service. Staff received ongoing training, supervision and support to ensure they had the knowledge and skills to work safely and effectively.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Our rating for this key question remains good. The provider took steps to ensure the effectiveness and positive outcomes of people’s care and support by assessing and reviewing their care and communication needs with them and, where appropriate, their relatives.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Our rating for this key question remains good. People’s independence, choice and control was promoted through the planning and delivery of their care and support. People and their relatives felt in control of their care and knew how to report their views and any concerns to the provider. They felt staff treated them with respect.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Our rating for this key question remains good. The provider took steps to avoid discrimination in the planning and delivery of people’s care and support, and to ensure people had equity in experience and outcomes. They gathered information about people’s protected characteristics in a sensitive manner and took these into consideration. People and their relatives confirmed they felt in control of their care and support.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Our rating for this key question remains good. The provider had developed robust governance and quality assurance systems and processes, designed to enable them to monitor the quality and safety of people’s care on an ongoing basis and take steps to drive improvement and share learning across the staff team. Staff and management understood what was expected of them in their respective roles.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Chiragkumar Modi
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 7 May 2022. Latest assessment published 19 December 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10717448 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does PSA Home Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for PSA Home Care Ltd.
When was PSA Home Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for PSA Home Care Ltd was published on 19 December 2024.
Who runs PSA Home Care Ltd?
PSA Home Care Ltd is run by PSA Home Care Ltd.
What is PSA Home Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 December 2024.

Contact

Address
19 Strathdene Road, Birmingham, B29 6QL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Victorious Living Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Bournville Gardens Village Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. RI
    Linday Office Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. –
    Faith & Hope Ltd Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham

See all home care services in Harborne