Rated Care Homes

Galilee Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 25 of 42

    rated home care services in Medway are rated Good, like this one.

Galilee Care: inspection record

Home care, Medway

Rated Good in March 2026, up from Inadequate.

Galilee Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Sambhana Care Ltd No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Assured Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Agincare UK Medway Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. –
    Platinum living care No overall rating, 0.8 miles away
  5. –
    Regalia Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Medway

See all home care services in Gillingham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 March 2026 (assessment visit 19 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Galilee care provided personal care for 38 people living in their own homes and one person in supported living. Some people had physical disabilities and some people lived with dementia.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was inspected in March 2025 and found to be in breach of the legal regulation in relation to person centred care, safeguarding people from abuse, safe care and treatment, safe deployment of staff and competency of staff, lack of robust recruitment practices, consent to care not always being obtained in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and poor governance. We rated the service as inadequate and it was placed in special measures.

The service was assessed on the 24 February 2026 and found it had made significant improvements in and was no longer in breach of person centred care, safeguarding people from abuse, safe care and treatment, safe deployment of staff and competency of staff, lack of robust recruitment practices, consent to care not always being obtained in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and poor governance. Therefore, the service is no longer in breach of the above regulations and is not rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key areas. .

On this inspection the service had improved in all aspects of personal care provided to people. People were involved in their care needs assessments which documented how they wanted to be supported. We saw that care plans contained meaningful risk assessments which provided guidance to staff on how to keep people safe. People were provided with information in ways that they could access and understand and contacted if staff were delayed in arriving to support people. People were now cared for in a safe way and that care was person centred. Staff were now sufficiently trained to provide the level of care that they needed and had been assessed as competent to do so. Staff ensured people’s dignity, human rights and privacy was respected and consent requested before care was provided. Recruitment practices had been improved and documented staff suitability checks had been made. Staff told us they were happy and felt supported by managers and felt able to voice concerns and that managers were approachable. The service held regular team meetings and obtained annual feedback so staff could raise matters or improvement suggestions. Leaders were knowledgeable and experienced in the provision of care. Leaders were approachable and supportive to care staff and the people they cared for. Leaders had actively sought to improve the service through review of other similar services that had been rated as good. A new electronic system had been introduced that audited and analysed the care provided and automatically calculated travel time between care visits. This increased provider oversight and governance which led to improvements in care delivery and improved punctuality which enabled staff to now remain for the full duration of their scheduled visits.

This service has been in Special Measures since 21 July 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. The service was in breach in relation to safeguarding people from abuse, safe care and treatment, safe deployment of staff and competency of staff and lack of robust recruitment practices. At this assessment we found the breaches had been met since our last inspection and the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. The service was in breach in relation to consent to care and treatment. At this assessment we found this breach had been met since our last inspection and the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment we found the service had improved and the rating had changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. The service was in breach in relation to person centred care. At this assessment we found the breach had been met since our last inspection and the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. The service was in breach in relation to Governance, management and sustainability. At this assessment we found this breach had been met since our last inspection and the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Christina Adebayo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 13 November 2021. Latest assessment published 20 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12298729 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Medway Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Galilee Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Galilee Care.
When was Galilee Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Galilee Care was published on 20 March 2026.
Who runs Galilee Care?
Galilee Care is run by Galilee Care LTD.
What is Galilee Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
07450 289692
Address
Unit 18, 105 Hopewell Business Centre, Hopewell Drive, Chatham, ME5 7DX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Sambhana Care Ltd No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Assured Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Agincare UK Medway Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. –
    Platinum living care No overall rating, 0.8 miles away
  5. –
    Regalia Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Medway

See all home care services in Gillingham