Rated Care Homes

16 Westmoreland Road

Home care, Brent

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

16 Westmoreland Road: inspection record

Home care, Brent

Rated Requires improvement in September 2026, down from Good.

16 Westmoreland Road: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 5 times since 2015. Rated Good in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2020, then Requires improvement in September 2026.

Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published 1 month ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 10 Requires improvement home care services in Brent, out of 69 with a rating.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 September 2026 (assessment visit 11 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment was carried out between 21 January and 10 June 2026.16 Westmoreland Road, also known as Quality of Homecare Limited, is a domiciliary care service providing support to adults who live in their own homes. At the time of our assessment the service was providing care and support to 351 people. The service supports adults with a wide range of needs, including older people and people living with dementia and physical needs. We reviewed all key questions and quality statements. We discussed the concerns with the management team during the assessment.

​The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance as we found that underpinning systems and governance were not always robust enough. The provider had not always made certain there were consistently effective arrangements in place for ensuring complete and contemporaneous records of people’s care, maintaining appropriate oversight and supervision of all staff, ensuring medicines management was always in line with practice requirements, and proactively analysing service information to identify emerging trends and themes. The provider had not always notified the CQC of certain events as required.

Read the full summary

The provider had recently introduced a number of improvements to people’s care and risk management planning and medicines management arrangements to ensure people’s support was safe. Care plans set out person-centred information about people’s needs, likes and preferences but some people’s plans still required more detail on how to meet their care and healthcare needs.

People were supported by staff who met their communication needs. However, the provider had not considered how to provide information in different formats to a large number of people who used the service and did not speak English as their first language.

People were supported consistently by staff who they felt knew them well. There were enough suitably skilled staff to support people safely. People felt safe and told us staff understood and met their needs. Staff supported people kindly, with dignity and respect.

There were safeguarding systems in place. The provider worked with statutory services to investigate safeguarding concerns, staff had completed safeguarding awareness training and knew how to raise concerns.

Staff received mandatory training so they could provide care safely. Staff described how they promoted people’s choices about their care, respected people’s privacy and maintained their dignity. People and their relatives said they were treated with kindness and respect. Staff said they felt supported and listened to by the provider.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service was supporting one person with a learning disability at the time of this assessment.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the governance and management of the service did not always support the delivery of consistently high-quality, person-centred care. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask the service

  • Safe was rated Requires improvement on 29 September 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  • Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 29 September 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Contact and registration details

Details for 16 Westmoreland Road
Address16 Westmoreland Road, Queensbury, London, NW9 9BW
NeighbourhoodQueensbury, Brent
Phone020 8200 0555
Registered managerVivian Mambo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
  • Dementia
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • Physical Disability
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 4 inspection reports, latest 1 January 2020 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 29 September 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for 16 Westmoreland Road
ProviderQuality Of Life Homecare Limited
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number08069109 (opens Companies House)

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    London Care (Queensbury) Home care, less than 0.1 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    MiHomecare - Queensbury Home care, less than 0.1 miles away
    Good
  3. –
    GN122 Health Care Limited Home care, 0.3 miles away
    Not yet rated
  4. –
    Paragon care and Locum Partnership Limited Home care, 0.3 miles away
    Not yet rated
  5. –
    Swan Care Group Ltd Home care, 0.3 miles away
    Not yet rated

See all home care in Brent

Getting help from London Borough of Brent

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does 16 Westmoreland Road provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for 16 Westmoreland Road.
When was 16 Westmoreland Road last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 16 Westmoreland Road was published on 29 September 2026.
Who runs 16 Westmoreland Road?
16 Westmoreland Road is run by Quality Of Life Homecare Limited.
What is 16 Westmoreland Road's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 29 September 2026.