Rated Care Homes

Avengers Prime Care

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 2 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 165 of 212

    rated home care services in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Avengers Prime Care: inspection record

Home care, Kent

Rated Good in September 2024.

Avengers Prime Care: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Kevin Cross Case Management Ltd Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
  3. –
    LOD Care and Case Management Ltd Not yet rated, 5.4 miles away
  4. –
    Care Solutions Kent Not yet rated, 5.5 miles away
  5. –
    Med-H Care Limited Not yet rated, 5.8 miles away

See all home care services in Kent

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 September 2024 (assessment visit 23 July 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Avengers Prime Care provide care to people in their own homes. The services specialises in providing personal care to children and adults with complex health conditions. Personal care includes the preparation of meals.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff knew people’s needs and had received appropriate training in order to help ensure people were well cared for. Staff were given sufficient time with people and they told us the registered manager ensured they did not work too many shifts in a row in order that they remain alert and able to provide good quality care. Staff were able to describe how they kept people safe. This included following guidance in people’s care plans around their health risks as well as being able to recognise and report signs of potential abuse. Staff followed good infection control processes and were supported by the registered manager through regular supervisions as well as team meetings.

Staff were recruited through robust recruitment processes and they had an induction and shadowed more experienced staff when first commencing in the role. Although staff did tell us they felt they would have benefitted from more shadowing sessions in the first instance. Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and how to give people’s choices, support them to make their own decisions and to remain independent. Staff supported people to access external activities of their choosing and they consistently looked for ways to improve people’s lives.

The registered manager carried out on-going monitoring of the service and its staff through governance arrangements, spot checks, surveys and individual meetings. They strove to provide good, consistent care to people and they had a clear vision of how they wished people to view their service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    People were safe with staff as staff had been trained in safeguarding and put this training into practice. Staff had infection control training and used appropriate personal protective equipment when providing personal care. Staff followed good medicines management practices and people received the medicines they were prescribed, although we gave feedback to the registered manager on how they could strengthen their medicine processes. There were sufficient staff to care for people in a way that met their needs.

  2. Effective

    Good

    People’s needs were assessed prior to commencing with the agency. This helped ensure that their needs could be met. The registered manager worked with external professionals to help provide effective care and they continually monitored people’s changing needs so they could adapt care appropriately. Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and put this into practice.

  3. Caring

    Good

    People received care from staff who respected them and protected their dignity. People said staff knew them well and enabled them to make their own choices and retain their independence where they could. Staff said they respected people as individuals and assisted them to stay in control of their care. Staff said the registered manager was mindful of their well-being and organised their work patterns so they had plenty of breaks.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    People were provided with person-centred care, one that focused on supporting them to access the community and enabling them to participate in activities and events of their choice. The registered manager said they took complaints seriously and would always respond, however one person said they did not always feel listened to. People received continuity of care as they saw the same team of carers.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Staff told us they felt supported in their role and the registered manager was approachable. They told us they were a good team and worked well together. The registered manager consistently monitored the service to help ensure they were providing good quality care to people. They did this through meetings with people, staff and anyone else involved in someone’s care, staff meetings, audits and spot checks on staff to help ensure they were following good practice. The registered manager and staff learnt from accidents and incidents and they shared this learning with the appropriate authorities. The registered manager had a clear vision on how they wished to grow the agency in the future.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lydia Madhusoodan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09637718 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Avengers Prime Care provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Avengers Prime Care.
When was Avengers Prime Care last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Avengers Prime Care was published on 18 September 2024.
Who runs Avengers Prime Care?
Avengers Prime Care is run by Avengers Prime Care Ltd..
What is Avengers Prime Care's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 September 2024.

Contact

Address
22 Chaplin Drive, Headcorn, Ashford, TN27 9TN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Kevin Cross Case Management Ltd Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
  3. –
    LOD Care and Case Management Ltd Not yet rated, 5.4 miles away
  4. –
    Care Solutions Kent Not yet rated, 5.5 miles away
  5. –
    Med-H Care Limited Not yet rated, 5.8 miles away

See all home care services in Kent