Cascade (Hurst House)
- Care home
- 8 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2021
- Norfolk, East of England
Outstanding
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
18 of 288
rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Outstanding, like this one.
Cascade (Hurst House): inspection record
Rated Outstanding in April 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Cascade Peters House Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
- G Cascade (Cohen House) Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Twin Oaks Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- RI Mayflower Court Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
- G Oakwood House Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 April 2026 (assessment visit 30 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
We conducted an inspection of Hurst House on 07 and 08 January 2026. Hurst House is a residential home registered for 8 adults with learning disabilities and autism situated in Norwich, Norfolk. We looked at all 5 key questions with all quality statements being assessed.
- Safe Outstanding
- Effective Outstanding
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
The service had been intentionally designed around the needs of autistic people and people with a learning disability, rather than adapting a traditional care model. From admission, people experienced support from a small, consistent staff group who took time to understand how each person communicated distress, choice, and preference. This approach resulted in people becoming more settled and confident over time, which was reflected in a sustained reduction in incidents and the need for restrictive interventions. Staff consistently interpreted behaviour as communication and responded proactively, enabling people to experience greater stability, choice, and independence.
Opportunities for staff to develop personally and professionally helped them to deliver high standards of person-centred care and staff were motivated to complete their role to the best of their ability.
Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding and how to promote people’s safety and to recognise how people communicated their needs. The reduction of incidents within the service illustrated how staff had become skilled in identifying and responding to people’s needs in a timely way.
People’s needs were clearly documented and regularly reviewed to ensure their accuracy. Case studies demonstrated the achievements people had made since living at the service. There was a sharp focus on promoting individual goals and independence with communication tools being adapted to help people express themselves and make their own choices. As part of the homes approach to lifetime learning people have clear learning and well-being objectives which they were supported to achieve with the support of care staff and staff working in an educational role.
There was an integrated approach to providing holistic care and support to ensure every young person was thriving and achieving their potential.
Strong links with the community and partnership working helped to ensure young people felt safe and a sense of belonging, identity and security and they were regularly supported to build friendships and retain links with family and friends.
There was a strong ethos and drive to continuously improve the service and learn from incidents, safeguarding concerns and complaints which were all seen as an integral part of the quality assurance process. Inclusive managers actively sought to support their staff through robust training programmes and a detailed programme of support. Staff felt able to raise any issue and described the service as inclusive. Staff knowledge helped them to support people to maximise their quality of life.
A staff member told us, “Personally I don't feel like I'm at work because it's one of the most amazing work settings one can wish for. Hurst has an amazing staff team and residents alike; both are welcoming and approachable”. They said, “it’s indeed a home away from home and I don't just feel safe at Hurst. I know I belong here.”
The environment was inclusive and helped to ensure people had a high standard of living and a building which was intuitive to their needs. For example, by creating different accommodation types both bedrooms and flats, subtle lighting, underfloor heating, and versatile space to promote people’s individual needs.
-
Safe
Outstanding
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated outstanding. This meant people were protected by a strong and distinctive approach to safeguarding, including positive risk-taking to maximise their control over their lives. People were fully involved, and the provider was open and transparent when things went wrong.
-
Effective
Outstanding
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected compared to similar services. People’s feedback described it as exceptional and distinctive.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Ecaterina Popa
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Cascade (Charlton House) Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 08966015 (opens Companies House)
Cascade (Charlton House) Limited runs 4 services, all in the East of England. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Cascade (Charlton House) Limited
- O Cascade (Charlton House) Outstanding. Care home, Norfolk
- – Cascade (Moore House) Not yet rated. Care home, Norfolk
- – Cascade Peters House Not yet rated. Care home, Norfolk
Getting help from Norfolk County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Norfolk County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0344 800 8020, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Norfolk County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Cascade (Hurst House) provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Cascade (Hurst House) as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Cascade (Hurst House) have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Cascade (Hurst House).
- When was Cascade (Hurst House) last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cascade (Hurst House) was published on 15 April 2026.
- Who runs Cascade (Hurst House)?
- Cascade (Hurst House) is run by Cascade (Charlton House) Limited. It runs 4 services, all in the East of England.
- What is Cascade (Hurst House)'s CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 15 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01603 443646
- Address
- 95 Grove Avenue, New Costessey, Norwich, NR5 0HZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Cascade Peters House Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
- G Cascade (Cohen House) Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Twin Oaks Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- RI Mayflower Court Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
- G Oakwood House Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away