Rated Care Homes

Benson House Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 14 of 111

    rated care homes in Oxfordshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Benson House Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 70 beds, Oxfordshire

Rated Requires improvement in February 2026, down from Good.

Benson House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rush Court (Good, 0.6 miles away) and OSJCT Westgate House (Good, 1.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Rush Court Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    OSJCT Westgate House Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
    Sotwell Hill House Good, 1.6 miles away
  4. –
    Waterside Court Care Home Not yet rated, 2.3 miles away
  5. G
    John Masefield House Good, 4 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

See all care homes in Wallingford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 February 2026 (assessment visit 17 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 31 October 2025 to 10 November 2025.Benson House Care Home is a residential and nursing home providing personal care to up to 70 older people, in a purpose built building over 3 floors. Some people were living with dementia. On the day of the inspection, 65 people were being supported by the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This inspection was prompted by concerns raised in relation to end of life care, medicine management and staffing. During the inspection we found evidence to support our concerns relating to the management of medicine.

We found two breaches of regulations in relation to good governance and safe care and treatment as medicines were not always managed well.

We were greeted warmly by the regional manager and staff, who were keen to demonstrate the improvements they had made to the service. The regional manager was running the home as the registered manager was on annual leave.

Some medicine records were not accurate or up to date. As required drugs [PRN] protocols were not completed consistently, and one drug had been administered routinely at a higher dosage without recording why. Monitoring and audit systems used to improve the service did not identify these concerns.

Care plans were clearly written, provided guidance and good examples of how people were supported to take part in day-to-day activities. Staff were aware how to identify and respond to changes in people’s needs. The service had initiatives in place to promote and support people with their health and wellbeing and routinely monitored people’s care and treatment. Documentation around capacity was completed appropriately.

Staff understood their responsibility to report concerns about safety. There were enough safely recruited and trained staff to carry out safe care. However, some staff told us there were not enough staff, particularly on the dementia floor. The environment met people’s needs and staff managed the risk of infection. The home was clean and free from malodours.

Personalised care was planned through discussions with people and their relatives. The service worked effectively with external agencies and professionals to ensure people’s needs were met in a planned and timely manner.

Leaders were passionate about delivering high quality care. Regular meetings were held with staff, including supervision, handovers, and daily briefings. Staff consistently told us how they felt supported in their roles.

We observed compassionate and kind care throughout our visit. Staff told us they enjoyed working at the home and understood the importance of providing care in a person-centred way. The service had built links with community services and healthcare services such as GP’s, physiotherapists, dentists, podiatrist, and opticians.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment in the way people’s medicines were managed at the service.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service, as audits failed to identify our concerns in relation to medicine.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 February 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 February 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Mary Deocadez
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 8 July 2022. Latest assessment published 16 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
CH (Benson) LimitedBrand: Caring Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12594995 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Oxfordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Benson House Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Benson House Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Benson House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 70 beds at Benson House Care Home.
When was Benson House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Benson House Care Home was published on 16 February 2026.
Who runs Benson House Care Home?
Benson House Care Home is run by CH (Benson) Limited.
What is Benson House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 16 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
01491 522930
Address
1 Churchfield Lane, Benson, Wallingford, OX10 6SH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rush Court (Good, 0.6 miles away) and OSJCT Westgate House (Good, 1.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Rush Court Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    OSJCT Westgate House Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
    Sotwell Hill House Good, 1.6 miles away
  4. –
    Waterside Court Care Home Not yet rated, 2.3 miles away
  5. G
    John Masefield House Good, 4 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

See all care homes in Wallingford