Sotwell Hill House
- Care home
- 36 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Wallingford, Oxfordshire, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
6 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
5 months
since the latest rating was published.
85 of 111
rated care homes in Oxfordshire are rated Good, like this one.
Sotwell Hill House: inspection record
Rated Good in June 2026, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Rush Court Good, 1 mile away
- G OSJCT Westgate House Good, 1.1 miles away
- RI Benson House Care Home Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
- – Waterside Court Care Home Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
- G John Masefield House Good, 3.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 June 2026 (assessment visit 23 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 15 April 2026 to 12 May 2026. Sotwell Hill House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to up to 36 older people. At the time of our inspection there were 17 people using the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We carried out this inspection to follow up on the Warning Notices previously issued to the provider and to assess whether the required improvements had been made.
At our previous inspection, the provider was found to be in breach of safe care and treatment. Improvements had been found at this inspection, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.
Improvements were needed to ensure care records were consistently accurate and up to date to fully support safe and coordinated care, however staff demonstrated a proactive approach to managing risks across care journeys. The provider remained in breach of good governance, as systems and processes to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service were not consistently effective.
Environmental issues were identified during the inspection, including emergency access control, and maintenance of safe environments. The provider took action to address the concerns found during inspection.
Care delivered reflected people’s needs and preferences in practice, and people spoke positively about aspects such as food and support with eating and drinking. There was a stable and sufficiently staffed team who provided consistent and responsive care.
The provider promoted an open culture where staff felt able to raise concerns. Systems supported timely access to services and positive outcomes, and care was delivered in a flexible and responsive way.
Governance systems were not consistently effective in ensuring oversight, accountability and compliance. During the inspection we identified issues, including gaps in recruitment records, training oversight, safeguarding processes, risk management and care planning, had not always been addressed or sustained. Audit processes had not consistently ensured actions were completed or embedded, reducing assurance risks were effectively managed and improvements maintained.
The provider remained in breach of good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement.
At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
The service remained in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance and were further in breach of failing to notify the commission of notifiable incidents.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Josephine Butterfield
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 23 August 2023. Latest assessment published 1 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Mr M E & Mr P R Butterfield
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Getting help from Oxfordshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Oxfordshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01865 519800, Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Oxfordshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Sotwell Hill House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Sotwell Hill House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Sotwell Hill House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Sotwell Hill House.
- When was Sotwell Hill House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sotwell Hill House was published on 1 June 2026.
- Who runs Sotwell Hill House?
- Sotwell Hill House is run by Mr M E & Mr P R Butterfield.
- What is Sotwell Hill House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 June 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01491 836685
- Address
- Brightwell cum Sotwell, Wallingford, OX10 0PS Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Rush Court Good, 1 mile away
- G OSJCT Westgate House Good, 1.1 miles away
- RI Benson House Care Home Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
- – Waterside Court Care Home Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
- G John Masefield House Good, 3.5 miles away