Rated Care Homes

Sotwell Hill House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 85 of 111

    rated care homes in Oxfordshire are rated Good, like this one.

Sotwell Hill House: inspection record

Care home, 36 beds, Oxfordshire

Rated Good in June 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Sotwell Hill House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rush Court Good, 1 mile away
  2. G
    OSJCT Westgate House Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Benson House Care Home Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
  4. –
    Waterside Court Care Home Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
  5. G
    John Masefield House Good, 3.5 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

See all care homes in Wallingford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 June 2026 (assessment visit 23 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 15 April 2026 to 12 May 2026. Sotwell Hill House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to up to 36 older people. At the time of our inspection there were 17 people using the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out this inspection to follow up on the Warning Notices previously issued to the provider and to assess whether the required improvements had been made.

At our previous inspection, the provider was found to be in breach of safe care and treatment. Improvements had been found at this inspection, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

Improvements were needed to ensure care records were consistently accurate and up to date to fully support safe and coordinated care, however staff demonstrated a proactive approach to managing risks across care journeys. The provider remained in breach of good governance, as systems and processes to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service were not consistently effective.

Environmental issues were identified during the inspection, including emergency access control, and maintenance of safe environments. The provider took action to address the concerns found during inspection.

Care delivered reflected people’s needs and preferences in practice, and people spoke positively about aspects such as food and support with eating and drinking. There was a stable and sufficiently staffed team who provided consistent and responsive care.

The provider promoted an open culture where staff felt able to raise concerns. Systems supported timely access to services and positive outcomes, and care was delivered in a flexible and responsive way.

Governance systems were not consistently effective in ensuring oversight, accountability and compliance. During the inspection we identified issues, including gaps in recruitment records, training oversight, safeguarding processes, risk management and care planning, had not always been addressed or sustained. Audit processes had not consistently ensured actions were completed or embedded, reducing assurance risks were effectively managed and improvements maintained.

The provider remained in breach of good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement.

    At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service remained in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance and were further in breach of failing to notify the commission of notifiable incidents.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Josephine Butterfield
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 23 August 2023. Latest assessment published 1 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from Oxfordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Sotwell Hill House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Sotwell Hill House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Sotwell Hill House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Sotwell Hill House.
When was Sotwell Hill House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sotwell Hill House was published on 1 June 2026.
Who runs Sotwell Hill House?
Sotwell Hill House is run by Mr M E & Mr P R Butterfield.
What is Sotwell Hill House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01491 836685
Address
Brightwell cum Sotwell, Wallingford, OX10 0PS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rush Court Good, 1 mile away
  2. G
    OSJCT Westgate House Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Benson House Care Home Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
  4. –
    Waterside Court Care Home Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
  5. G
    John Masefield House Good, 3.5 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

See all care homes in Wallingford