Rated Care Homes

Holly House Care Home

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 7 of 86

    rated care homes in Sunderland are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Holly House Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 40 beds, Sunderland

Rated Outstanding in March 2026, up from Good.

Holly House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Washington Manor Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Washington Lodge Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Donwell House Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Washington Grange Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    The Grove Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Sunderland

See all care homes in Washington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 March 2026 (assessment visit 11 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 30 January to 10 February 2026. Holly House Care Home is residential service for up to 40 people who might have a physical disability or be living with dementia. At the time of inspection, 38 people were using the service. We completed this inspection as part of our routine programme and because of the length of time that has elapsed since the last full inspection was completed.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Outstanding
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Outstanding
Read the rest of CQC's summary

During this inspection we found a truly exceptional, deeply embedded culture of kindness, safety, professionalism and continuous improvement, which was consistently modelled by leaders, embraced by staff and experienced by people using the service.

People experienced exceptionally safe, compassionate and highly personalised care. Staff were consistently warm, respectful and attentive, and relatives described the home as a highly supportive, welcoming and responsive service. Staff knew people extremely well and used this knowledge to tailor care, support choices and promote independence. People felt valued and told us care was delivered in a calm and unhurried way that upheld their dignity. Professionals praised the strong relationships they observed between staff, people and families.

The provider demonstrated a strong and proactive approach to safety. There was an exceptionally well‑established learning culture, reflective supervision and robust systems for reviewing incidents. Staff acted promptly when needs changed, and the service used technology innovatively and responsibly, such as wellbeing sensors and hydration monitoring tools, to reduce risks and enhance people’s independence.

Safeguarding processes were effective and people told us they felt safe and well supported. The environment was clean, homely and well maintained.

Assessments were detailed, regularly reviewed and informed by health and social care professionals partnership working. Staff implemented clinical advice proactively and demonstrated strong knowledge of people’s needs. Professionals, including GPs, dietitians and technology specialists, gave highly positive feedback about communication, responsiveness and the quality of joint working. Professionals were extremely complimentary about the registered manager and their proactive response to participating in research projects.

The service excelled in promoting people’s experiences. People were listened to and actively involved in decisions about their care. People enjoyed a rich activities programme and were supported to maintain relationships, interests and community connections. Staff worked with people to develop creative and innovative approaches to meaningful activity such as video blogging, which had led to media interest and people from other countries contacting the person. Staff worked sensitively with people and families on future planning, including end‑of‑life care.

Leadership at Holly House was exceptionally strong. Managers modelled compassionate, inclusive and values‑led practice and had created a positive culture where staff felt supported, respected and able to speak up. Staff described Holly House as the best place they had worked, and said they felt valued, supported and proud of the care they delivered. This strong culture influenced people’s experiences, contributing to a consistent sense of warmth, safety, trust and genuine compassion throughout the service. Governance arrangements were robust, with effective oversight of quality, risk and improvement. Staff were motivated, skilled and proud of the care they delivered. Partners described the service as professional, collaborative and forward‑thinking, and relatives felt confident in the management team’s commitment to continuous improvement.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At the last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Outstanding

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At the last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected compared to similar services. People’s feedback described it as exceptional and distinctive.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people andtreated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At the last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs. At the last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Outstanding

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At the last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant service leadership was exceptional and distinctive. Leaders and the culture they created drove and improved high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rachel Redman
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 21 October 2022. Latest assessment published 18 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11481000 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sunderland City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Holly House Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Holly House Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Holly House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Holly House Care Home.
When was Holly House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Holly House Care Home was published on 18 March 2026.
Who runs Holly House Care Home?
Holly House Care Home is run by Holly House Care Limited.
What is Holly House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 18 March 2026.

Contact

Address
Albany Way, Washington, NE37 1BJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Washington Manor Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Washington Lodge Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Donwell House Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Washington Grange Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    The Grove Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Sunderland

See all care homes in Washington