Rated Care Homes

Washington Lodge

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 6 of 86

    rated care homes in Sunderland are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Washington Lodge: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 65 beds, Sunderland

Rated Requires improvement in September 2026, down from Good.

Washington Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Washington Grange (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Washington Manor Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Washington Grange Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Washington Manor Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. O
    Holly House Care Home Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Donwell House Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    St Georges Residential Home Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Sunderland

See all care homes in Washington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 September 2026 (assessment visit 10 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this assessment between 28 July and 10 August 2026. We visited the service on 28 July 2026 and 4 August 2026. Washington Lodge is a nursing home which provides nursing and personal care for up to 65 people, some of whom were living with dementia. There were 41 people living at the home. The provider was currently in administration, and in the process of being sold.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This inspection was due to concerns about people’s care and safety. In particular, concerns about skincare, poor hygiene, delayed responses to care needs, high use of agency staff, medicines management, ineffective management oversight, pressure on staff and a lack of a qualified chef. We found some evidence of some these concerns during our inspection.

Care plans did not reflect people’s current needs. Positional change records were not completed correctly and we were not assured people received skin care they needed. These observations had not been identified through the provider’s quality assurance processes. In response, the registered manager had reviewed all care plans and completed an action plan. They had identified the improvements needed and set timescales for staff to complete the required work. However, these improvements had not been identified through the provider’s usual quality assurance processes.

The registered manager monitored and risk assessed staffing levels to ensure a suitable number of staff were deployed. However, staff raised concerns about staffing pressures they faced. This included having insufficient time to spend quality time with people, due to the volume and duplication of paperwork. They also raised concerns about staff retention challenges and the frequent use of agency staff.

Staff spoke positively about the registered manager. They also described the home as having a supportive culture and good teamwork. Staff received regular supervision and appraisal.

The service had effective systems for managing incidents, accidents and safeguarding concerns, with analysis undertaken to identify learning and areas for improvement. Systems were in place to monitor and manage Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) applications and authorisations appropriately.

The environment was clean and people's bedrooms were personalised to reflect their preferences and interests. However, parts of the environment needed refurbishing and upgrading to enhance the overall experience for people living at the home.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 28 September 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 28 September 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lyndsay Martin
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 14 April 2023. Latest assessment published 28 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Qualia Care LimitedBrand: Qualia
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10060267 (opens Companies House)

Qualia Care Limited runs 8 services in England, 1 of them in the North East. 5 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Qualia Care Limited

  1. G
    Gilwood Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Blackpool, North West
  2. G
    High Peak Lodge Residential & Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Wigan, North West
  3. G
    Hillside Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Knowsley, North West
  4. G
    Millfield Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Rochdale, North West

See all 8 services run by Qualia Care Limited

Getting help from Sunderland City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Washington Lodge provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Washington Lodge as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Washington Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 65 beds at Washington Lodge.
When was Washington Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Washington Lodge was published on 28 September 2026.
Who runs Washington Lodge?
Washington Lodge is run by Qualia Care Limited. It runs 8 services in England, 1 of them in the North East.
What is Washington Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 28 September 2026.

Contact

Address
The Avenue, Washington, NE38 7LE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Washington Grange (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Washington Manor Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Washington Grange Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Washington Manor Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. O
    Holly House Care Home Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Donwell House Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    St Georges Residential Home Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Sunderland

See all care homes in Washington