Kolbe House
Care home, Ealing, 25 beds
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Kolbe House: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 4 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016, then Requires improvement in 2018, then Good in 2019 and September 2026.
The latest rating was published 1 month ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 29 Good care homes in Ealing, out of 35 with a rating.
- Smaller than 7 in 10 care homes in Ealing.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 September 2026 (assessment visit 15 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service
Kolbe House is a ‘care home’ without nursing for up to 25 older people. There were 15 people living at the service at the time of our inspection. Kolbe House is run by a charitable organisation with a management committee that has oversight of the home and the care provided.
Read the full summary
Who the service is for
Kolbe House is a residential care home for older people predominantly from the Polish community. The registered manager, deputy manager and staff spoke Polish. People were supported to maintain their links to the Polish community and culture.
Key findings
We carried out this assessment between 10 July 2026 and 5 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA principles. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions, and they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.
Staff confirmed they had completed training on how the MCA affects the care and support provided to people. A staff member told us, “We always assume that a person has the capacity to make decisions until otherwise stated, we support them in making their own decisions, and we always act in their best interests when they are unable to decide on their own.”
Following an incident, accident or complaint an investigation was completed and the outcomes were shared with staff to identify any improvements which could be implemented. The provider followed processes to identify and report any safeguarding concerns to protect people from the risk of abuse. Staff confirmed they had completed training on safeguarding adults and children and demonstrated their understanding of how to protect people from the risk of abuse. Medicines were administered as prescribed and were managed safely. Staff told us they felt confident when they supported people with their medicines. Risks were identified and staff were provided with guidance on how to manage potential risks. The provider had a robust recruitment process, and staff were supported with regular supervision and team meetings. Staff told us they felt supported by senior staff and able to raise any questions with them. A staff member said, “[Senior staff] apply the ‘open door’ principle, you can always come to them with a question or problem, as well as talk on an ongoing basis during shared meals.”
Regular checks were carried out to ensure the environment of the home was safe. People’s support needs were identified, with care plans and risk assessments being regularly reviewed to ensure they reflected people’s current care needs. Staff completed a range of training
We saw staff provided care in a kind, caring and respectful manner. Staff understood people’s needs, preferences and wishes in relation to their care. Staff told us they supported people to be as independent as possible and make choices about their daily lives. A staff member commented, “I adapt the way I communicate to the way the person understands. I ask what is important to them, what makes them feel safe and comfortable. I support and respect the decisions made by the person, even if the choices are ill-considered.”
People were supported with their religious, cultural and spiritual needs with staff using people’s preferred language, providing the culturally appropriate meals they enjoyed and arranging visits to meet their religious needs.
Staff told us they felt the home was well managed and there was a shared culture of openness, kindness and support. A staff member told us, “The best thing about working at Kolbe House is that there is a real homely atmosphere. Residents feel at home here, they are treated with respect, kindness and care. I am glad that I can be part of a place where we care not only for the care needs of residents, but also for their well-being and sense of security.”
The provider had a range of audits in place to monitor the quality of the care provided. A healthcare professional, who worked closely with the home, told us, “The management and staff have been consistently professional, warm and supportive. Their communication is excellent. The staff demonstrate a deep knowledge of their residents. Information sharing is consistent and reliable which provided great reassurance that safe, person-centred care is delivered.”
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 18 Hanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 3HH |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Ealing town, Ealing |
| Phone | 020 8992 4978 |
| Website | www.kolbehouse.co.uk |
| Registered manager | Beata Parylak |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 5 inspection reports, latest 6 February 2019 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 11 September 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Kolbe House Society |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | IP17823R (opens Companies House) |
| Charity number | 254960 |
Nearest alternatives
- RI Ealing Manor Nursing Home Care home with nursing, 0.4 miles awayRequires improvement
- G Kenilworth Nursing Home Care home with nursing, 0.5 miles awayGood
- RI Beech Haven Care home, 0.7 miles awayRequires improvement
- G Torkington House Care home, 0.7 miles awayGood
- G Acton Care Centre Care home with nursing, 0.8 miles awayGood
Getting help from London Borough of Ealing
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Ealing
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8825 8000
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Ealing
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Kolbe House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Kolbe House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Kolbe House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 25 beds at Kolbe House.
- When was Kolbe House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kolbe House was published on 11 September 2026.
- Who runs Kolbe House?
- Kolbe House is run by Kolbe House Society.
- What is Kolbe House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 September 2026.