Rated Care Homes

Rosebank Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Outstanding to Requires improvement.

  • 18 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 14 of 111

    rated care homes in Oxfordshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Rosebank Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 28 beds, Oxfordshire

Rated Requires improvement in April 2025, down from Outstanding.

Rosebank Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Homestead (Good, 3.9 miles away) and Millers Grange (Good, 4.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Brize Meadow Lodge Not yet rated, 3.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Richmond Village Witney Requires improvement, 3.9 miles away
  3. G
    The Homestead Good, 3.9 miles away
  4. G
    Millers Grange Good, 4.1 miles away
  5. G
    Cedar Court Care Home Good, 4.7 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 April 2025 (assessment visit 5 November 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 13 December 2024 to 30 January 2025. The service is a residential care home service providing personal care for older people living with dementia, mental health conditions and physical disabilities. The assessment was prompted by concerns received about people's safety, dignity, and governance of the service. A decision was made for us to assess and examine those risks. We undertook a focused assessment to review 9 quality statements. For those quality statements not assessed, we used the ratings awarded at the last assessment to calculate the overall rating. We found 2 breaches in relation to safeguarding and governance. However, where restrictions were in place, the service did not always consider less restrictive options, and assessments of peoples’ mental capacity were not always robust. The provider did not have effective systems in place to monitor the service to ensure compliance with the fundamental standards and ensure sufficient oversight of staff training and appraisals. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment. However, the provider had safeguarding processes in place and people could raise concerns. People were supported to manage risks. The service assessed and managed the risk of infection. There were enough staff to meet peoples’ needs. Information pertaining to peoples’ protected characteristics was considered and their individual needs were met. The service ensured medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities, and preferences by enabling them to be involved in planning, including when changes happen. The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture which was communicated to staff and people via regular meetings and correspondence.

  • Safe No rating
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Outstanding
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people were not always safe and protected from avoidable harm. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to the need for consent.

  2. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has remained outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care.

  3. Responsive

    Outstanding

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has remained outstanding. This meant services were tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  4. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. The service was in breach of the legal regulation relating to governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 April 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 April 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Vanessa Susan Lavender
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People detained under the Mental Health Act, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 10 March 2020. Latest assessment published 25 April 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04107119 (opens Companies House)

Rosebank Nursing Homes Limited runs 4 services in England, 2 of them in the South East. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Rosebank Nursing Homes Limited

  1. G
    Dungate Manor Good. Care home, Surrey
  2. RI
    Ardtully Retirement Residence Requires improvement. Care home, Essex, East of England
  3. RI
    Old Shenfield Place Requires improvement. Care home, Essex, East of England

Getting help from Oxfordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rosebank Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rosebank Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rosebank Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 28 beds at Rosebank Care Home.
When was Rosebank Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rosebank Care Home was published on 25 April 2025.
Who runs Rosebank Care Home?
Rosebank Care Home is run by Rosebank Nursing Homes Limited. It runs 4 services in England, 2 of them in the South East.
What is Rosebank Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 April 2025.

Contact

Phone
01993 225481
Address
High Street, Bampton, OX18 2JR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Homestead (Good, 3.9 miles away) and Millers Grange (Good, 4.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Brize Meadow Lodge Not yet rated, 3.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Richmond Village Witney Requires improvement, 3.9 miles away
  3. G
    The Homestead Good, 3.9 miles away
  4. G
    Millers Grange Good, 4.1 miles away
  5. G
    Cedar Court Care Home Good, 4.7 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire