Rated Care Homes

Ventura

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 82 of 86

    rated care homes in North Somerset are rated Good, like this one.

Ventura: inspection record

Care home, 7 beds, North Somerset

Rated Good in January 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Ventura: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Felix House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Ashcombe Court Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Beaconsfield House Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Hilltop Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Ellenborough Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in North Somerset

See all care homes in Weston-super-Mare

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 January 2026 (assessment visit 27 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 5 to 12 November 2025. Ventura is a care home registered to provide accommodation and personal care to adults with mental health support needs. The service provides care and support to up to 7 people. At the time of the assessment there were 5 people using the service. At our last inspection, published September 2023, the service was rated requires improvement. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. We carried out this assessment to review actions taken by the provider following our last inspection. Some improvements were identified at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment. However, in relation to good governance, we did not identify sufficient improvement, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. We assessed 18 quality statements in the safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led key questions. The rating for the safe key question has changed to good. The ratings for the quality statements we did not assess remain unchanged. The overall rating for the service has changed to good. Improvements had been made since the last inspection in relation to people’s risk assessments, infection prevention and control and policies and procedures. However, further work was needed to ensure governance systems were consistently effective in areas such as water temperature monitoring, staff recruitment and incident records. People and their relatives spoke positively about their experience of the service. Individual risks were assessed, and people were supported to take positive risks. Staff knew people well and felt supported in their roles. There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs, and medicines were managed safely. The service maintained positive working relationships with other health and social care professionals. The provider responded positively to the shortfalls identified. We asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant governance was inconsistent and not always effective to monitor the quality and safety of the service. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. At this assessment we did not identify sufficient improvement, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 5 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Natalie Cole
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Mental Health

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 2 September 2023. Latest assessment published 5 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05838400 (opens Companies House)

Kismet House Care Home Limited runs 2 services, all in the South West. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Kismet House Care Home Limited

  1. G
    Kismet House Good. Care home, North Somerset

Getting help from North Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ventura provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Ventura as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Ventura have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Ventura.
When was Ventura last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ventura was published on 5 January 2026.
Who runs Ventura?
Ventura is run by Kismet House Care Home Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South West.
What is Ventura's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 January 2026.

Contact

Phone
01934 782652
Address
16 Swiss Road, Weston Super Mare, BS23 3AX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Felix House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Ashcombe Court Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Beaconsfield House Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Hilltop Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Ellenborough Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in North Somerset

See all care homes in Weston-super-Mare