Rated Care Homes

The Old Rectory Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 30 of 153

    rated care homes in Warwickshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

The Old Rectory Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, Warwickshire

Rated Requires improvement in February 2026, down from Good.

The Old Rectory Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ingleby House (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Chamberlaine Court (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Ingleby House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Chamberlaine Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Collyhurst Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Derwent Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Fairfield Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Bedworth

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 February 2026 (assessment visit 7 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 1 December 2025 to 9 December 2025. The Old Rectory Care Home is a care home providing personal care and accommodation to adults of all ages, some of whom were living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 19 people living at the home.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The inspection was completed due to the age of the rating. Therefore, a comprehensive inspection covering the 5 key questions, safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led was carried out.

During the inspection we spoke with people who lived at the home, their relatives, staff, the registered manager, and external healthcare professionals.

Improvements were required in risk management, environmental safety, infection control, and the safe management of medicines. People’s mental capacity was not assessed effectively and governance and oversight systems required improvement. However, staff reported and learnt from incidents. Safeguarding practices were understood, and staff were recruited safely. People’s needs were assessed, and people were supported to maintain their health and wellbeing. Staff consistently demonstrated kindness, empathy, and respect, promoting dignity and person-centred care. Staff responded promptly to people and care was tailored to individual needs. The service had a positive culture and staff felt supported to speak up.

The registered manager was responsive to our feedback and had taken swift action to address concerns, including making positive changes to the environment and committing to making improvements to governance processes and documentation.

The provider was in breach of 3 legal regulations relating to safety, governance and consent.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this inspection.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 February 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 3 February 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 February 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Angela Gunbie
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 16 March 2021. Latest assessment published 3 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05439782 (opens Companies House)

First For Care Limited runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by First For Care Limited

  1. G
    Esplanade House Good. Care home, Isle of Wight, South East
  2. RI
    Butterley House Requires improvement. Care home, Derbyshire, East Midlands

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Old Rectory Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Old Rectory Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Old Rectory Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at The Old Rectory Care Home.
When was The Old Rectory Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Old Rectory Care Home was published on 3 February 2026.
Who runs The Old Rectory Care Home?
The Old Rectory Care Home is run by First For Care Limited. It runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands.
What is The Old Rectory Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 February 2026.

Contact

Address
Leicester Road, Bedworth, CV12 8BU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ingleby House (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Chamberlaine Court (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Ingleby House Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Chamberlaine Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Collyhurst Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Derwent Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Fairfield Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Warwickshire

See all care homes in Bedworth