Rated Care Homes

Manton Hall

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in January 2020.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 8 of 11

    rated care homes in Rutland are rated Good, like this one.

Manton Hall: inspection record

Care home, 34 beds, Rutland

Rated Good in January 2020.

Manton Hall: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Crown House Care Home Good, 2.9 miles away
  2. G
    Rutland House Community Trust Good, 2.9 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Rutland Care Village Good, 3.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Aberdeen House Requires improvement, 3.4 miles away

See all care homes in Rutland

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 11 January 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Manton Hall is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 34 older people. At the time of our inspection 32 people were living in the service.

What inspectors found

People received safe care and were protected against avoidable harm, neglect and discrimination. Risks to people's safety were assessed and strategies were put in place to reduce any risks. People received care from staff that were safely recruited. There were enough staff to ensure people's care needs were met. People's medicines were safely managed, and systems were in place to control and prevent the spread of infection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's needs were assessed before they went to live at the service. Staff received an induction when they first commenced work at the service and ongoing training that enabled them to provide effective care.

People were supported to eat and drink enough to maintain their health and well-being. Staff placed a strong emphasis on the dining experience to ensure it was enjoyed by all. Staff supported people to live healthier lives and have access to healthcare services.

The service had a friendly atmosphere where visitors were welcomed. The premises were homely and adapted to meet the needs of people using the service.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff provided care and support in a caring and meaningful way. They knew the people who used the service very well and had built up kind and compassionate relationships with them. People and relatives, where appropriate, were involved in the planning of their care and support. People's privacy and dignity was always maintained.

People's care plans were detailed and supported staff to provide personalised care. People were encouraged to take part in a variety of activities and interests of their choice. There was a complaints procedure in place and systems to deal with complaints effectively. The service provided end of life care to people when required.

The service was well managed. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and actions were taken, and improvements were made, when required. We received positive comments from people using the service, relatives and staff who praised the support they received from the manager. Staff were motivated to work to the values of the service to ensure people received good quality care.

The service worked in partnership with outside agencies. Staff, people using the services and relatives were encouraged to provide feedback which was analysed and acted upon when required.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Gemma Booth
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 11 January 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06333996 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Rutland County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Manton Hall provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Manton Hall as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Manton Hall have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 34 beds at Manton Hall.
When was Manton Hall last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Manton Hall was published on 11 January 2020.
Who runs Manton Hall?
Manton Hall is run by Foundation Care (Norwich) Limited.
What is Manton Hall's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 January 2020.

Contact

Phone
01572 737212
Address
Lyndon Road, Manton, Oakham, LE15 8SR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Crown House Care Home Good, 2.9 miles away
  2. G
    Rutland House Community Trust Good, 2.9 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Rutland Care Village Good, 3.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Aberdeen House Requires improvement, 3.4 miles away

See all care homes in Rutland