Rated Care Homes

Bowbrook House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 76 of 101

    rated care homes in Shropshire are rated Good, like this one.

Bowbrook House: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, Shropshire

Rated Good in August 2026.

Bowbrook House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Uplands at Oxon Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    38 Torrin Drive Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Radbrook Nursing Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. –
    The Mount & Severn View Not yet rated, 1.4 miles away
  5. RI
    The Ferns Residential Home Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away

See all care homes in Shropshire

See all care homes in Copthorne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 August 2026 (assessment visit 19 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment – 22 June – 7 July 2026

The service is a residential care home providing personal care and support to older people, some of whom are living with dementia.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported by staff who were committed to promoting their wellbeing, independence and quality of life. Feedback from people, relatives and staff was overwhelmingly positive and reflected a service with a strong culture of kindness, openness and continuous improvement.

The service was led by a visible and approachable management team who promoted a family-oriented culture where people, relatives and staff felt valued and respected. Staff consistently demonstrated the provider's values and were motivated to deliver care which treated people as individuals. People were supported to make choices about their care and daily lives, and staff took time to understand what was important to them.

People and relatives told us they felt safe and well cared for. Staff understood how to recognise and respond to safeguarding concerns and worked proactively with healthcare professionals and external agencies to promote people's safety and wellbeing. There was a positive culture of openness and learning throughout the service, with staff feeling confident to raise concerns, discuss mistakes and learn from incidents.

People benefited from good access to healthcare support. Staff worked effectively with a wide range of health and social care professionals to ensure people received coordinated care and treatment. Assessments and care planning processes were comprehensive and regularly reviewed to ensure care continued to meet people's changing needs. Staff responded promptly to changes in people's health and wellbeing and supported people to achieve positive outcomes, maintain their independence and live healthier lives.

Staff promoted people's dignity, respected their privacy and supported them to remain involved in decisions about their care. People were encouraged to participate in activities which mattered to them, contributing to a positive quality of life.

The provider had established governance systems to monitor the quality and safety of the service. Audits and oversight processes were in place and were used to identify trends, monitor performance and drive improvement. Where we found some gaps in risk assessments, the registered manager was responsive to these findings and took immediate action to address this.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jennifer English
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 15 July 2023. Latest assessment published 26 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05207492 (opens Companies House)

English Care Limited runs 3 services, all in the West Midlands. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by English Care Limited

  1. G
    Lady Forester Community Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Shropshire
  2. G
    Offices, Bowbrook House Good. Home care, Shropshire

Getting help from Shropshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bowbrook House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bowbrook House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Bowbrook House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Bowbrook House.
When was Bowbrook House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bowbrook House was published on 26 August 2026.
Who runs Bowbrook House?
Bowbrook House is run by English Care Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Bowbrook House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01743 247071
Address
Bowbrook, Shrewsbury, SY3 5BS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Uplands at Oxon Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    38 Torrin Drive Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Radbrook Nursing Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. –
    The Mount & Severn View Not yet rated, 1.4 miles away
  5. RI
    The Ferns Residential Home Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away

See all care homes in Shropshire

See all care homes in Copthorne