Rated Care Homes

Offices, Bowbrook House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 47 of 59

    rated home care services in Shropshire are rated Good, like this one.

Offices, Bowbrook House: inspection record

Home care, Shropshire

Rated Good in July 2025.

Offices, Bowbrook House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Shrewsbury Approved Care and Support Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Headway House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  3. –
    Positive Steps Shropshire Limited No overall rating, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Domiciliary Services Shrewsbury Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Shropshire

See all home care services in Copthorne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 July 2025 (assessment visit 25 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 2 July 2025 to 7 July 2025. The service is a Domiciliary Care Agency (DCA) registered to provide personal care. People were supported with their personal care needs to enable them to live in their own homes and promote their independence. This care was provided in peoples own apartments within Foresters Court, which is a set of retirement apartments. At the time of the inspection the service supported 5 people with personal care. This was the service’s first rated inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People received safe care as staff assessed and mitigated risks. People had individual care plans which informed staff on how they wished to be supported. These were detailed and contained information on potential risks to the person’s health and safety, so staff could effectively support them. Where it was needed people were supported with their medicines by trained and competent staff members.

People were safeguarded from the risks of ill-treatment or abuse as the staff team had received training and knew what to do if they suspected wrongdoing.

People’s assessments recorded their preferences and communication styles. Assessments were updated to reflect any changes in health. People remained responsible for arranging their own health care with partner healthcare providers in the community. However, if it was needed or wanted, staff were available to support them to ensure they received positive outcomes.

Although the service was not responsible for supporting all people with their diet and hydration, staff monitored and supported if there were changes of people’s care needs.

People were treated with kindness and with compassion by a caring staff team. People had their dignity and privacy respected by staff who promoted their independence. People knew how to give feedback on their care. The management team had systems in place to address any comments including compliments, suggestions and complaints.

Staff were supported by a management team who were approachable, knowledgeable and compassionate. The management team focused on continued improvement and reviewed significant events, such as incidents or accidents, to seek learning and minimise the potential for incidents reoccurring. The management team has systems in place to respond to concerns if any were raised with them.

People were supported by staff who were effectively trained and who had been recruited safely.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jennifer English
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05207492 (opens Companies House)

English Care Limited runs 3 services, all in the West Midlands. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by English Care Limited

  1. G
    Bowbrook House Good. Care home, Shropshire
  2. G
    Lady Forester Community Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Shropshire

Getting help from Shropshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Offices, Bowbrook House provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Offices, Bowbrook House.
When was Offices, Bowbrook House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Offices, Bowbrook House was published on 28 July 2025.
Who runs Offices, Bowbrook House?
Offices, Bowbrook House is run by English Care Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Offices, Bowbrook House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 July 2025.

Contact

Phone
01743 266950
Address
Bowbrook House, Bowbrook, Shrewsbury, SY3 5BS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Shrewsbury Approved Care and Support Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Headway House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  3. –
    Positive Steps Shropshire Limited No overall rating, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Domiciliary Services Shrewsbury Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Shropshire

See all home care services in Copthorne