Alma Lodge Care Home
- Care home
- 14 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2010
- Eastbourne, East Sussex, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
6 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in March 2026.
7 months
since the latest rating was published.
39 of 258
rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Alma Lodge Care Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in March 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Camelot Residential Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Elstree Court Care Home (Good, 0.2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Camelot Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Elstree Court Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Chaseley Good, 0.2 miles away
- G The Devonshire Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Little Acorns Good, 0.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 March 2026 (assessment visit 7 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment, 12 January to 23 January 2026.
Alma Lodge Care Home is a residential care home providing personal care up to a maximum of 14 people. The service provides support to older people with physical health needs. Some people were living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 10 people living at the home, one of whom was admitted to hospital during the inspection.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service was last inspected in May 2022 and rated Requires Improvement with breaches of regulation in safe care and treatment and good governance. This inspection was planned to follow up on concerns received, regarding peoples’ safety and well-being, and we took this opportunity to look at the previous breaches of regulation.
At this inspection, we identified areas that still needed to improve, and the rating has remained Requires Improvement. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations of safe care and treatment, and good governance. Not enough improvements were found at this inspection and the provider remained in breach of these regulations. We also found a breach of the regulation about safe and effective staffing.
People’s safety was not consistently considered, and risk was not managed pro-actively. There were no records of lessons learned following incidents. Care plans and risk assessments were not up to date or consistent with each other. There were care plans missing for some people. Whilst staff and people said they could speak up; they also said action had not always been taken. The governance and overview of processes had not ensured safe and consistent care. The in-house audits were not consistently robust and had not identified the shortfalls found and discussed during the inspection process. The provider took immediate action to make improvements where issues had the potential to impact on safe outcomes for people. For example, specific care documentation and risk assessments.
There were insufficient numbers of staff deployed, and care staff were also doing the cooking, cleaning and doing the laundry. This meant at times staff struggled to provide the support and care necessary for people. There was only one care staff member on duty between the hours of 6pm and 8pm which meant there was insufficient cover in the case of an emergency. The staff rota did not identify the staff on duty at night, and the management teams working hours were not reflected on the rota.
The home was not adequately clean and there were some environmental risks identified such as unsafe flooring which could be a trip hazard.
New staff received an induction and training which enabled them to manage people’s health and social care effectively. People’s privacy was respected and their independence encouraged within the limits of personal safety. Feedback relating to communication and response to concerns was mixed with some people reporting positive and timely responses from the service when issues were raised, and others telling us there was often a delay in getting answers when they raised queries. People told us that staff were kind and caring. Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and there was a friendly culture in the service.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service continues to be in breach of the legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care, however we did find improvements to the safe management of medicines, and a new breach in relation to staffing.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care. -
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 9 March 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 9 March 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 9 March 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Dawn Owasil
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 22 June 2022. Latest assessment published 9 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Alma Lodge Care Home
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Getting help from East Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 60 80 191, 8am to 8pm, 7 days a week (including bank holidays)
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Alma Lodge Care Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Alma Lodge Care Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Alma Lodge Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 14 beds at Alma Lodge Care Home.
- When was Alma Lodge Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Alma Lodge Care Home was published on 9 March 2026.
- Who runs Alma Lodge Care Home?
- Alma Lodge Care Home is run by Alma Lodge Care Home.
- What is Alma Lodge Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 9 March 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01323 734208
- Address
- Staveley Road, Eastbourne, BN20 7LH Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Camelot Residential Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Elstree Court Care Home (Good, 0.2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Camelot Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Elstree Court Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Chaseley Good, 0.2 miles away
- G The Devonshire Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Little Acorns Good, 0.4 miles away