Orchard House Nursing Home
- Care home
- 32 beds
- Nursing care
- Registered since 2011
- Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2017, most recently Good in May 2025.
17 months
since the latest rating was published.
214 of 258
rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.
Orchard House Nursing Home: inspection record
Rated Good in May 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Southlands Place Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- G St Peter's Care and Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Springbank House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Elizabeth Court Rest Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Mais House Good, 0.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 May 2025 (assessment visit 10 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 15 April 2025
Orchard House Nursing Home is a residential care home with nursing, providing support to older people living with dementia and nursing needs. There were also people who lived with a range of health conditions such as strokes, diabetes, heart complaints, Parkinson’s disease and general mobility problems. At the time of the inspection there were 28 people living at the home. It is a large, detached home with accommodation across three floors and two ground floor wing extensions.
- Safe Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We undertook this responsive assessment to check on specific concerns we had received about the peoples' safety and well-being, the culture and the management of risk in the service. The provider had recently added nursing care to their registration and appointed a new manager and clinical lead, which had resulted in concerns being raised.
We did not identify any significant issues during this assessment and the service has remained Good, with minor areas identified for continued improvement.
People received safe care and staff managed risks safely. People and staff told us they would feel confident to raise any concerns and that these would be responded to by the management team. There was an openness from staff that things had been difficult in the latter part of 2024, but with a new management team, they felt they could speak up and be listened to. The provider had liaised with external health professionals to provide joined up care and treatment for people. This had promoted safe transitions for people moving between different services. Staff and management knew people well and received an induction, training and support that enabled them to manage people’s health and social care effectively, and in a responsive way. Staffing levels needed to be reviewed to ensure they were sufficient to meet the increased needs of people. Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and there was a positive and open culture in the service. Areas for improvement were identified regarding governance, and these were mainly in ensuring that changes to people’s health were updated in all areas of the documentation, some of which had already been identified by the manager and were being worked on. We received a full action plan with timescales during the assessment process. There were also ongoing improvement plans to make further improvements to the home.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
We identified staffing levels needed to be improved and this was actioned immediately. There was evidence of learning from incidents and accidents. Staff were able to tell us how to keep people safe from harm and abuse. Staff had received relevant training in relation to their roles. We observed the home was clean and staff followed infection prevention and control practices. There were safe practices in relation to robust recruitment processes. People were given their medicine in a timely manner and administration of medicines was appropriately recorded. There were processes in place to support good medicines optimisation. We observed people’s individual risks were being managed and people had accessed external support to meet their individual needs.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has improved too Good.
The culture of the service had improved and was positive, and one where learning was part of everyday practice. The manager was available and approachable to staff, people and families. The staff team said they felt valued and well supported in their roles, that communication had improved and, things had settled down. They felt enabled and able to ask anything and make suggestions for improvement of the service. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Francesca Ddungu
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 22 May 2019. Latest assessment published 15 May 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 06449264 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from East Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 60 80 191, 8am to 8pm, 7 days a week (including bank holidays)
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Orchard House Nursing Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Orchard House Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Orchard House Nursing Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 32 beds at Orchard House Nursing Home.
- When was Orchard House Nursing Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Orchard House Nursing Home was published on 15 May 2025.
- Who runs Orchard House Nursing Home?
- Orchard House Nursing Home is run by Southlands Court Care Homes Limited.
- What is Orchard House Nursing Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 May 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01424 211898
- Address
- Orchard House, St Johns Road, Bexhill On Sea, TN40 2EE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Southlands Place Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
- G St Peter's Care and Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Springbank House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Elizabeth Court Rest Home Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Mais House Good, 0.4 miles away