Rated Care Homes

Country Court

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 20 of 72

    rated care homes in Hull are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Country Court: inspection record

Care home, 34 beds, Hull

Rated Requires improvement in January 2026, down from Good.

Country Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wilton Lodge - Care Home (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Durham Street (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Alexandra Court Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wilton Lodge - Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Churchill House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. RI
    Birkdale Court Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Durham Street Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Hull

See all care homes in Summergangs

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 January 2026 (assessment visit 11 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 17 and 18 November 2025. Country Court is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for older adults, including people living with dementia. Whilst people told us they felt safe, and staff were observed to be kind and respectful, concerns persist around governance, risk management and care planning.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

However, improvements had been made since the last inspection including better safeguarding oversight and more structured audits. Care plans were person centred and specific, although some risk assessments were generic and not routinely reviewed. Infection prevention and control practices were variable, and environmental audits identified refurbishment needs that had not been addressed. Furthermore, some staff did not correctly sanitise their hands. Staffing levels were sufficient, and staff spoke positively about teamwork and support from local managers.

Leadership remains a key area of concern. Governance systems did not ensure timely action on all identified risks, and some staff expressed frustration about the provider’s lack of engagement and investment. Whilst the acting manager and deputy were valued for their commitment, the absence of effective provider-level leadership undermines progress.

Overall, the culture within the home is caring and staff are dedicated, but systemic weaknesses in leadership, governance and planning mean the service cannot yet demonstrate consistent, high-quality, person-centred care.

We found the previous breach in relation to person centred care, safeguarding, consent, safe care and treatment were now met and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. There was a continued breach in relation to governance. There has been no registered manager in post for over 18 months, which was a breach of registration conditions. Whilst there are now governance systems in place, these are not always effective in identifying issues and addressing them in a timely way. This is a continued breach of regulation in relation to good governance.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website if appropriate, after any representations and / or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Bianca Thompson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 22 March 2023. Latest assessment published 16 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02782831 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hull City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Country Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Country Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Country Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 34 beds at Country Court.
When was Country Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Country Court was published on 16 January 2026.
Who runs Country Court?
Country Court is run by Pearl Dusk Limited.
What is Country Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 16 January 2026.

Contact

Phone
01482 702750
Address
North Country Court, Southcoates Lane, Hull, HU9 3TQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wilton Lodge - Care Home (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Durham Street (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Alexandra Court Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wilton Lodge - Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Churchill House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. RI
    Birkdale Court Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Durham Street Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Hull

See all care homes in Summergangs