Rated Care Homes

The Lodge Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in July 2025.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 116 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Good, like this one.

The Lodge Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 32 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Good in July 2025.

The Lodge Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Thurnby Fields Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Thurn Court Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Willowbrook Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Hambleton House Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Spencefield Grange Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Oadby

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 July 2025 (assessment visit 9 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection 16 and 18 June 2025. The inspection was prompted by a review of information we held about the provider.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Lodge Residential Home is a care home registered to provide personal care and accommodation for up to 32 older people. At the time of the inspection, the service was supporting 28 people.

Systems and processes were in place to support an inclusive and positive culture of learning and improvement. Leaders worked with people, their relatives, staff and external partners to support in the delivery of safe care and good outcomes for people. Ongoing monitoring and auditing enabled the provider and management team to continually improve and respond to feedback, including concerns.

Leaders were committed to providing a non-discriminatory and safe environment for people using the service and staff. Practices ensured people’s consent to care was obtained for all health and care interventions, and where people lacked capacity to make informed decisions then best interests decisions were made and documented.

People’s care records emphasised the importance of staff treating people as individuals, and with kindness, compassion and dignity. Care plans provided information about people’s lives prior to moving into the home, including information as to their work history, family life, hobbies and interests. Care plans, reflected people’s care needs, including future plans with regards to end of life care. Potential risks were assessed, with care records providing guidance for staff on how to mitigate risk and support people well.

Processes were in place to facilitate and support people to live healthier lives through ongoing reviewing and monitoring of people’s needs. Timely referrals were made to health care professionals in response to changes in people’s needs. Health care professionals were positive about staff’s response to the monitoring of people’s health and spoke highly of staff’s knowledge and understanding of people’s health needs. Staff acted upon the guidance and advice given by health care professionals.

People’s needs were met by sufficient staff, who had undergone a safe recruitment process, and who had the training and knowledge to enable them to meet their needs. People received their prescribed medicines safely and when required. However, improvements were needed to ensure medicine given as and when required was supported by clear guidance as to how a person may express anxiety or pain, and whether the administration of the medication had had the desired effect. The environment was clean and well maintained.

Staff were committed to their work and acknowledged the support they received from the provider, registered manager and management team. Staff spoke positively of their colleagues and of how the staff team worked collaboratively to meet people’s needs and in the delivery of good quality care.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ana Henriques Andrade
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 3 March 2022. Latest assessment published 3 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04714441 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Lodge Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Lodge Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Lodge Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 32 beds at The Lodge Residential Home.
When was The Lodge Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Lodge Residential Home was published on 3 July 2025.
Who runs The Lodge Residential Home?
The Lodge Residential Home is run by The Lodge Thurnby Ltd.
What is The Lodge Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 July 2025.

Contact

Address
Grange Lane, Thurnby, LE7 9PH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Thurnby Fields Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Thurn Court Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Willowbrook Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Hambleton House Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Spencefield Grange Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Oadby