Rated Care Homes

Bramble Cottage Retirement Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 72 of 83

    rated care homes in Brighton and Hove are rated Good, like this one.

Bramble Cottage Retirement Home: inspection record

Care home, 28 beds, Brighton and Hove

Rated Good in October 2026.

Bramble Cottage Retirement Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hallmark Maycroft Manor Luxury Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Place Farm House Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Dane House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Victoria Highgrove Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Oaklands Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Brighton and Hove

See all care homes in Withdean

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 October 2026 (assessment visit 6 October 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

The service is a care home providing personal care support for up to 28 people. There were 24 people using the service at the time of the assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This service supports older people and people with physical disabilities, some of whom are living with dementia.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 7 October 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People received safe, effective and person-centred care from staff who treated them with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff supported people in line with their needs and wishes. Risks to people had been assessed and measures put in place to minimise these. Systems were in place to safeguard people. Staff demonstrated a good knowledge of this and there was a strong ethos about keeping people safe from harm.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

Concerns had been appropriately documented and reported to the relevant agencies. Accident and incidents were monitored for any learning opportunities and to minimise recurrence.

There were enough staff with the correct skill set to provide safe care to people. Staff spoke positively about the training available and how it supported them to complete their role. Staff were encouraged to develop their skills and excel in their work. Staff felt supported in the roles and received regularly supervision. All staff spoke positively about the registered manager and how they wouldn’t hesitate to raise any concerns they had.

The environment was clean and tidy. People had personalised items in their rooms. The housekeeping team followed suitable checklists to ensure tasks were completed consistently. Equipment was safely checked and maintained to a good standard.

Medicines were managed safely. The registered manager regularly undertook medicines rounds themselves to maintain oversight of this. Staff received appropriate training to ensure they remained competent to administer medicines.

People’s needs had been robustly assessed. Staff knew people well and delivered care in line with their needs and wishes. Staff worked alongside external professionals to ensure people achieved good outcomes in relation to their health and wellbeing. One professional told us, “Staff are always fully informed of their resident's needs. There is excellent communication with us, which ensures appropriate and timely care can be provided.”

There was a positive culture within the service, with systems in place to provide effective oversight of the quality and safety of care. Leaders understood their responsibilities and the registered manager monitored the service to identify risks and opportunities for improvement. The registered manager told us, “I’m so proud of the team. They are so hands on and reliable. I trust them to do a good job, and they do.” Learning opportunities were used to support good practice and drive continuous improvement, helping to ensure people continued to receive good-quality care.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Diana Shaw
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 24 January 2020. Latest assessment published 27 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03287316 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Brighton and Hove City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bramble Cottage Retirement Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bramble Cottage Retirement Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Bramble Cottage Retirement Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 28 beds at Bramble Cottage Retirement Home.
When was Bramble Cottage Retirement Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bramble Cottage Retirement Home was published on 27 October 2026.
Who runs Bramble Cottage Retirement Home?
Bramble Cottage Retirement Home is run by Bramble Care Homes Limited.
What is Bramble Cottage Retirement Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01273 565821
Address
18 Carden Avenue, Patcham, Brighton, BN1 8NA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hallmark Maycroft Manor Luxury Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Place Farm House Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Dane House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Victoria Highgrove Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Oaklands Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Brighton and Hove

See all care homes in Withdean