Rated Care Homes

Silverways Nursing Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 121

    rated care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Silverways Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 61 beds, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

Rated Requires improvement in May 2026, down from Good.

Silverways Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Greenways (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Corner Cottage (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Greenways Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Corner Cottage Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Highcliffe Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Little Amberwood Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. O
    Avon Reach Outstanding, 1.5 miles away

See all care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

See all care homes in Highcliffe

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 May 2026 (assessment visit 3 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 7 to 14 April 2026.

Silverways Nursing Home provides accommodation, personal care and nursing care, for up to 61 people. At the time of our inspection there were 58 people using the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This inspection was prompted by concerns we received about the safety of care provision. We found 2 breaches of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Medicines were not always managed safely. People’s care plans were routinely reviewed, however daily notes showed support provided was not always in accordance with assessed needs. For example, when repositioning people or supporting them with exercises.The provider’s checks and audits were not always used effectively. This placed people at potential risk of avoidable harm.

We asked the provider for an action plan in response to the shortfalls found at this inspection.

The provider and registered manager responded to shortfalls identified and started to make the necessary changes to the systems in place.

Staff knew people well and were kind and caring, taking into consideration people’s individuality. A diverse range of activities were provided.Staff referred people to health and social care professionals in a timely manner.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the service management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 28 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 28 May 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Janine May
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 4 November 2023. Latest assessment published 28 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP12988R (opens Companies House)

Christchurch Housing Society runs 2 services, all in the South West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Christchurch Housing Society

  1. G
    Avondene Care Home Good. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

Getting help from BCP Council (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council)

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Silverways Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Silverways Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Silverways Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 61 beds at Silverways Nursing Home.
When was Silverways Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Silverways Nursing Home was published on 28 May 2026.
Who runs Silverways Nursing Home?
Silverways Nursing Home is run by Christchurch Housing Society. It runs 2 services, all in the South West.
What is Silverways Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 28 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01425 272919
Address
Silver Way, Highcliffe-on-Sea, Christchurch, BH23 4LJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Greenways (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Corner Cottage (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Greenways Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Corner Cottage Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Highcliffe Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Little Amberwood Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. O
    Avon Reach Outstanding, 1.5 miles away

See all care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

See all care homes in Highcliffe