Rated Care Homes

Westfield House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 116 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Good, like this one.

Westfield House: inspection record

Care home, 31 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Good in October 2025, up from Inadequate.

Westfield House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Lester Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Huntingdon Court Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Aarons Specialist Unit Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Matthews Neurorehab Unit Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    The Hall Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Loughborough

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 October 2025 (assessment visit 12 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 29 and 30 September 2025. The assessment was carried out to check if improvements had been made following our last assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Abbeyfield Loughborough is a residential service providing support to younger people, and older people living with dementia. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to staffing. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of the regulation.


The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. The manager investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks.

The facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were mainly clean and any risks identified were mitigated. However, we identified handrails had chipped paint which exposed porous wood making it difficult to clean effectively. Improvements and redecoration were ongoing at the service.

There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience to care for people. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervisions to maintain high-quality care.

Medicines were not always stored safely, we identified fridge temperatures had dropped below the required minimum. However, when brought to the provider’s attention this was acted upon promptly. Medicines were administered safely. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved relevant people and made decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity. Staff responded to people in a timely way.

The provider supported staff well-being. Staff provided information people could understand. People and relatives knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it.

Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive. Managers were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement. There was evidence of positive changes that had been made to the service since our last assessment.The provider made the decision to close Ingleside, an additional part of the service, which reduced their maximum capacity, to enable a more focussed and effective implementation of the required improvements.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to
    safe staffing. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Tracy Taylor
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 15 December 2023. Latest assessment published 27 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Westfield House (Care) LtdBrand: Abbeyfield Society
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
00754694 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
238168

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Westfield House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Westfield House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Westfield House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 31 beds at Westfield House.
When was Westfield House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Westfield House was published on 27 October 2025.
Who runs Westfield House?
Westfield House is run by Westfield House (Care) Ltd.
What is Westfield House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 October 2025.

Contact

Phone
01509 266605
Address
42-44 Westfield Drive, Loughborough, LE11 3QL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Lester Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Huntingdon Court Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Aarons Specialist Unit Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Matthews Neurorehab Unit Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    The Hall Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Loughborough