Rated Care Homes

Halland House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 22 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 214 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Halland House: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, East Sussex

Rated Good in December 2024.

Halland House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Crockstead Farm House Good, 0.7 miles away
  2. –
    Lydfords Care Home Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away
  3. G
    The New Inn Good, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Copper Beech Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away
  5. G
    Thornbury Residential Home Good, 3.2 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Uckfield

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 December 2024 (assessment visit 30 September 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Halland House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for 30 people with learning disabilities and autism. There were 30 people living at the home when we inspected. The assessment commenced on 14 October 2024 when we visited the service unannounced. This assessment was in response to CQC receiving information of concern. An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported to participate in activities of their choice, this included attending clubs and venues to reflect their individual interests. Improvements were needed to ensure people who were frail and had increased needs were able to take part in a range of activities that reflected their changing needs and abilities. There were systems to make sure people were protected from the risks of abuse or discrimination. Staff understood the risks associated with the people they supported keeping them safe from injury or harm whilst ensuring people were not subject to any unnecessary restrictions. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Staff received training appropriate to their role which included specific training to support people with a learning disability and autistic people. We found improvements were needed in some aspects of the service. This included the governance of the service and record keeping. Some people’s relatives told us they were not always included or updated about people’s care reviews and some staff did not feel supported. These areas also need to be reviewed and developed. The management team told us work had commenced to address these issues.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Staff completed training that reflected the needs of people who lived at the home. There were regular environmental safety checks and the home was currently being refurbished and updated.

    Improvements were needed in relation to medicines to ensure they were managed safely. Staff were knowledgeable about abuse and knew how to raise concerns and alerts. Risks to people were managed in the least restrictive way possible. Staff knew people well and understood the risks associated with their support needs.

    However, care plans and records did not always contain the relevant or up to date information. Work was ongoing to improve this.

  2. Effective

    Good

    People’s support needs were assessed and reviewed on a regular basis, to help ensure their needs continued to be met. However, improvements were needed to ensure people’s care plans included all the relevant information. Key worker reviews were being developed to support people to identify goals and aspirations but these had not been fully implemented. Staff were aware of the importance of asking for people’s consent before supporting them and ensuring their wishes were respected.

  3. Caring

    Good

    People were encouraged to make their own decisions and choices about their day-to-day life. People were supported by staff who were kind and compassionate. They promoted a supportive environment where people’s independence was promoted. However, some staff told us they did not always feel supported. We raised this with the management team as an area to review and develop.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    People received support that was person centred. Staff helped to ensure people were treated fairly, with respect and without fear of discrimination. Information was provided in a range of formats such as pictorial and Easy Read to meet people’s individual needs. Improvements were needed to ensure all relatives who wished to be, were involved in communication about their loved ones. Consideration was also needed to be given to the range of activities available to people who had become more frail with age.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    We found improvements were needed to some aspects of governance and record keeping at Halland House. Improvements were also needed to some care plans and risk assessments to ensure they contained all the relevant information to guide staff.

    The management team had identified improvements were needed at the home. Changes had been introduced and this included a range of checks and audits. Action plans had been developed to address the identified shortfalls and these were regularly reviewed at weekly management meetings. However, these had not always been recorded and did not identify all the areas for improvement we found.

    Although some staff told us they did not feel supported all staff were committed to improving and developing the service for the benefit of people.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 30 December 2024. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Amina Whitehouse
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 10 February 2021. Latest assessment published 30 December 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
01033833 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Halland House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Halland House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Halland House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Halland House.
When was Halland House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Halland House was published on 30 December 2024.
Who runs Halland House?
Halland House is run by Gary Richard Homes Limited.
What is Halland House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 December 2024.

Contact

Phone
01825 840268
Address
Eastbourne Road, Halland, Lewes, BN8 6PS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Crockstead Farm House Good, 0.7 miles away
  2. –
    Lydfords Care Home Not yet rated, 1.5 miles away
  3. G
    The New Inn Good, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Copper Beech Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away
  5. G
    Thornbury Residential Home Good, 3.2 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Uckfield