Rated Care Homes

Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 40 of 49

    rated care homes in Bury are rated Good, like this one.

Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury: inspection record

Care home, 32 beds, Bury

Rated Good in February 2023, up from Requires improvement.

Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cameron House Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Epworth Grange Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Jubilee Heights Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Alfred House Residential Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Bank House Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Bury

See all care homes in Central Bury

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 2 February 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Abbeydale Residential Care Home – Bury is a residential care home providing personal or nursing care to up to 32 people. The service provides support to older people some of whom may be living with dementia and/or physical disability. At the time of our inspection there were 27 people using the service.

What inspectors found

Improvements had been made to the service. Systems and processes had been introduced for the reporting and recording of issues related to safeguarding, accidents and incidents. The new management team and wider staff group fully understood their individual and collective responsibilities in this area.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The management of medicines had improved. People received their prescribed medicines when they needed them. The service worked in partnership with other professionals, and the community when able to do so. However, the home's medicines policy and procedure were not available for staff to access when we inspected. We recommend the policies are reviewed and made available.

Although on the day of inspection we found there were enough staff available, the layout of the building meant there were occasions staff were not available to assist people in their bedrooms. We have made a recommendation about the deployment of staff.

People were assessed prior to moving into the service and were supported by staff with a good level of knowledge and skills. We have made a recommendation about recognising and responding to conditions that are likely to deteriorate.

People care plans had been updated since our last inspection. However, there was further scope to make these care plans much more person-centred. Activities at the home had improved, with a new activities co- ordinator recruited. People we spoke with felt the activities within the home could be improved further and the manager confirmed activities would be strengthened.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The provider had made improvements to staff training and competency checks to ensure staff had the skills, knowledge and competence to care for people safely. Staff supervision sessions were not yet fully embedded; however, a plan was in place and staff we spoke with felt supported.

The provider's quality assurance processes had improved and were effective in driving in improvements across the service. This was evident in the premises, fire safety and review of incidents and accidents to ensure people received a safe service. However, the registered provider needed to implement their own

governance checks to ensure they had robust oversight of the managers new governance systems.

The home had a new manager in post who had worked at the home for approximately 7 months at the time of our inspection. The feedback we received was positive regarding the changes they made since taking up the role. The current staff team spoke of a positive culture at the home, with good team work throughout.

Rating at the last inspection and update The last rating for the service was requires improvement [published July 2022] and there were breaches of regulations. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider had met the requirements of the warning notice regarding Regulation 17.

At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of regulations.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 2 February 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Victoria Mcmahon
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 2 February 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06456344 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Bury Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 32 beds at Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury.
When was Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury was published on 2 February 2023.
Who runs Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury?
Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury is run by Prime Healthcare (Bury) Limited.
What is Abbeydale Residential Care Home - Bury's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 2 February 2023.