Rated Care Homes

Garland House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Garland House: inspection record

Care home, 20 beds, Kent

Rated Good in July 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Garland House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Hollies Rest Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Fountains Lodge Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    Tunbridge Wells Care Centre Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    Crossways Community Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Birchwood House Rest Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 July 2026 (assessment visit 12 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this assessment between 19 May and 10 June 2026. Garland House is residential care home providing support for up to 20 older and younger adults, some of whom were living with dementia. At the time of the assessment there were 18 people living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We undertook this assessment due to the age of the previous rating. At the last inspection in 2020, the service was rated overall as Requires Improvement. The provider had focused on improving the service in all areas which had resulted in some areas of outstanding practice.

An assessment has been undertaken of a service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability but is not registered as a specialist service. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The providers, one of whom was also the registered manager, had developed a strong, person-centred culture at the service. Staff well-being was central to the running of the service. People and staff were equally valued and praised. This was achieved by acknowledging staff and people’s strengths, achievements and the little things that made a difference in their lives. As a result, there was a stable staff team and people received a good quality of life. Staff were motivated to develop their skills and knowledge. Staff had been supported to develop their skills and acted as champions in specific areas in relation to people’s assessed needs and shared their learning with the staff team.

Health professionals said the service was particularly skilled in identifying changes in people’s health and wellbeing. Comments from health care professionals included, “Even though they are not a nursing home, they seem to escalate at the right time”; “They have a good understanding of what their residents' medical issues are, and their mood.”

The provider understood the importance of gaining feedback from a variety of sources about the service and using them to improve the service. There were clear plans about how the provider was going to further develop the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred support; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred support.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jennifer Davis
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 30 June 2021. Latest assessment published 21 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05152335 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Garland House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Garland House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Garland House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 20 beds at Garland House.
When was Garland House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Garland House was published on 21 July 2026.
Who runs Garland House?
Garland House is run by Davis Care Limited.
What is Garland House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 21 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01892 532707
Address
Garland House, 2 Garlinge Road, Southborough, Tunbridge Wells, TN4 0NR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Hollies Rest Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Fountains Lodge Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    Tunbridge Wells Care Centre Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    Crossways Community Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Birchwood House Rest Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Kent