Rated Care Homes

Holyhead Care Centre

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 44 of 68

    rated care homes in Coventry are rated Good, like this one.

Holyhead Care Centre: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, Coventry

Rated Good in September 2026.

Holyhead Care Centre: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Northumberland Road Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Gloucester House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Allambie House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Bedford House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Parkview House Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Coventry

See all care homes in Central Coventry

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 September 2026 (assessment visit 16 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Hollyhead Care Centre is a residential care home, providing accommodation and care for up to 26 people. At the time of the inspection there were 24 people living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Hollyhead Care Centre provides support to adults who have specialist needs relating to their mental health.

We carried out this assessment on 16 September to 24 September. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We found people were supported safely by staff who knew them well and staff treated people with dignity and respect while delivering person centred care. Risks related to people’s care was well managed with frequent reviews of peoples care needs. Care records were detailed, giving staff clear guidance in how to support people, including people’s communication and cultural needs. Staff were able to explain how they supported people to meet their goals and remain as independent as possible.

People told us and records confirmed there were enough skilled staff to support people at the service. There were effective systems and processes in place to support people and to ensure they were safeguarded from abuse and neglect.

Medicines were administered and stored safely. Staff were knowledgeable about people’s medicines and ensured people knew why medicines had been prescribed.

Staff were recruited safely, with effective recruitment processes in place to ensure staff were appropriate to work with vulnerable people, including disclosure and baring checks (DBS).

The service was clean and well maintained. The registered manager and management team carried out regular audits and monitoring of the environment to ensure the environment remained safe. A refurbishment plan was in place concentrating on making peoples rooms more personal to them.

The registered manager and provider had effective oversight of accidents and incidents. Any learning from incidents within the service and any other homes owned by the provider were shared with staff to improve outcomes for people.

Staff described the manager as visible, helpful and responsive to their concerns.

People received care that was person centred to their needs as staff knew them and their routines well. The registered manager told us how they supported people by using a relationship-based approach rather than being task focused, this included finding out what was important to people. However, some improvements could be made to ensure care records are more person centred and reflect how involved people are in their own care. Other improvements, including analysis of accidents and incidents had already been identified by the provider, with new systems in the process of being embedded across all of their services.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rinson Maliekkal Devassy
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 5 February 2022. Latest assessment published 29 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02888621 (opens Companies House)

Interhaze Limited runs 7 services in England, 6 of them in the West Midlands. 5 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Interhaze Limited

  1. G
    Cedarwood Care Centre Good. Care home, Birmingham
  2. G
    Minster Lodge Care Home Good. Care home, Coventry
  3. G
    The Hunters Lodge Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Staffordshire
  4. G
    The Spinney Care Home Good. Care home, Coventry

See all 7 services run by Interhaze Limited

Getting help from Coventry City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Holyhead Care Centre provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Holyhead Care Centre as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Holyhead Care Centre have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Holyhead Care Centre.
When was Holyhead Care Centre last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Holyhead Care Centre was published on 29 September 2026.
Who runs Holyhead Care Centre?
Holyhead Care Centre is run by Interhaze Limited. It runs 7 services in England, 6 of them in the West Midlands.
What is Holyhead Care Centre's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 September 2026.

Contact

Address
85-89 Holyhead Road, Coundon, Coventry, CV1 3AD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Northumberland Road Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Gloucester House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Allambie House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Bedford House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Parkview House Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Coventry

See all care homes in Central Coventry