Rated Care Homes

Pine Lodge Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Pine Lodge Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 59 beds, Kent

Rated Good in October 2026, up from Inadequate.

Pine Lodge Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Aspley House Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Elvy Court Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Hill Farm Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    Insight SBS ltd 201 London Road Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Bobbing

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 October 2026 (assessment visit 23 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment took place between 14 September and 21 September 2026. We visited the service on 14 September 2026. Following the visit, we spoke to people and reviewed documents off site.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service is a care home registered for up to 59 older people and people living with dementia. At the time of the inspection 32 people were receiving a regulated activity living at the service.

At the last inspection, we found 4 breaches of the regulations relating to safe care and treatment, dignity and respect, staffing and good governance. At this assessment, the service had made considerable improvement and was no longer in breach of regulation. The service rating has improved to Good.

People were now safe and protected from avoidable harm. Safeguarding concerns were appropriately reported and investigated, and people’s rights under the Mental Capacity Act were understood. Care plans and risk assessments had improved and had sufficient detail to ensure people received care that was safe. Staff knew people well, and staffing, training, supervision and recruitment supported safe care. The environment was safe including improvement of the fire safety arrangement. The service worked effectively with health and social care professionals. There was enough staff to support people. Staff had the training they needed to deliver good care and were well supported.


Staff were patient, kind and respectful, responded promptly when people needed help, and supported choice, independence and meaningful activity. People were involved in decisions and could raise concerns or complaints. Care was increasingly personalised, with improved assessment, communication, continuity and access to healthcare. Staff supported people’s nutrition, mobility and wellbeing, and monitored health risks and outcomes. A particular strength was the service’s exceptional approach to equity in experiences and outcomes in how people with dietary needs were supported. Staff developed attractive, dignified and inclusive meals, improved nutritional content, involved relatives, shared learning with professionals and reduced the need for external nutritional referrals. Dementia-friendly environmental improvements had also been made.

Leadership and culture had improved significantly. The registered manager was visible, approachable and experienced, and people, relatives and staff described a more open, supportive and positive service. Staff felt listened to and worked well as a team. Systems for reporting incidents, learning lessons and reducing risks were effective.

Some areas were still not consistently effective. Infection prevention practices were not always consistent: parts of the service needed deeper cleaning, and some staff did not change gloves appropriately when handling food. Medicines practice also needed strengthening, including storage of sachets, administration timing, interruptions during medicines rounds and checks on over-the-counter medicines. Governance oversight had not identified all medicines and constipation-monitoring risks. The registered manager acted promptly when concerns were raised and addressed concerns during the inspection.

This service has been in Special Measures since 21 September 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements had been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Bindu Kharel
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 24 August 2023. Latest assessment published 23 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Eleanor Nursing and Social Care LimitedBrand: Eleanor Healthcare Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04393038 (opens Companies House)

Eleanor Nursing and Social Care Limited runs 20 services in England, 5 of them in the South East. 14 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Eleanor Nursing and Social Care Limited

  1. G
    Addington Heights Good. Care home with nursing, Croydon, London
  2. G
    Bradbury House Good. Care home with nursing, Kent
  3. G
    Ealing Office Good. Home care, Ealing, London
  4. G
    Eleanor Nursing & Social Care Ltd - Brent Office Good. Home care, Brent, London

See all 20 services run by Eleanor Nursing and Social Care Limited

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Pine Lodge Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Pine Lodge Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Pine Lodge Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 59 beds at Pine Lodge Care Home.
When was Pine Lodge Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Pine Lodge Care Home was published on 23 October 2026.
Who runs Pine Lodge Care Home?
Pine Lodge Care Home is run by Eleanor Nursing and Social Care Limited. It runs 20 services in England, 5 of them in the South East.
What is Pine Lodge Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 October 2026.

Contact

Address
26-32, Key Street, Sittingbourne, ME10 1YU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Aspley House Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Elvy Court Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Hill Farm Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    Insight SBS ltd 201 London Road Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Bobbing