Rated Care Homes

Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 20 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 59 of 254

    rated care homes in Lincolnshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street: inspection record

Care home, 2 beds, Lincolnshire

Rated Requires improvement in February 2025, down from Good.

Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Homer Lodge Care Centre (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Canwick Court Care Centre (Good, 0.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Homer Lodge Care Centre Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Monson Retirement Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Canwick Court Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Eastholme Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Lincoln Manor Care Home Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Lincolnshire

See all care homes in Canwick

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 February 2025 (assessment visit 27 September 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 12 November to 13 December 2024 We assessed a small number of quality statements from the safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led key questions and found areas of concern. The scores for these areas have been combined with scores based on the key question ratings from the last inspection. At the last assessment the provider had not always carried out Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks to ensure staff were suitable to work in that type of service. At this assessment, DBS checks had been carried out prior to staff starting work, however, other recruitment checks such as ensuring there was a full employment history for staff had not been done. We found the provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to staffing and good governance. There were not enough staff to safely support people. Training was not always effective in ensuring staff knew how to assess risk and understand how to support people when they were distressed. The role and responsibilities of the registered manager were not always carried out due to them having to support people as there were not enough staff. Care plans were not up to date with the most relevant information. We also found plans to guide staff on supporting people positively to avoid distress did not contain the most up to date information which put people and staff at risk. Despite our findings, people were living in a clean and well-maintained environment. People felt they could make decisions about how they wanted to be supported and what they wanted to do. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    We assessed all 8 quality statements in the safe key question. We found 1 breach of legal regulation relating to staffing. There were not enough staff to safely support people. Staff completed training in line with their role, however training was not always effective in ensuring staff knew how to assess risk and understand how to support people when they were distressed. Incidents were not always safely managed, and lessons were not learnt to reduce the risk of reoccurrence to improve people’s quality of life. People were supported to understand safeguarding and how to keep themselves safe. Staff understood their responsibility to safeguard people and knew how to raise concerns.

  2. Effective

    Good

    At this assessment we did not assess all quality statements within this key question. We assessed 2 quality statements in the effective key question and found areas of good practice and areas of concern. Although people felt they received good support, care plans were not up to date and did not reflect people’s assessed needs. People told us they could make decisions, however there was a concern people did not always have the mental capacity to understand decisions they were making. Furthermore, decisions were being made in people’s best interests without consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    At this assessment we did not assess all quality statements within this key question. We assessed 1 quality statement in the caring key question. People were supported to access the community and maintain relationships with friends and family. However, people were often impacted by other people’s choices due to staff not having the skills and confidence to individually support a person out of the home.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    At this assessment we did not assess all quality statements within this key question. We assessed 1 quality statement in the responsive key question. People felt they were treated fairly, and their human rights were respected.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    At this assessment we did not assess all quality statements within this key question. We assessed 1 quality statement in the well-led key question. We found 1 breach of legal regulation relating to the management of the service. Systems and processes were ineffective in ensuring records were regularly reviewed. Care plans and other records did not contain the most up to date information and risks were not always assessed. The provider had not acted in line with contingency plans to ensure the service remained safe when there were unexpected staff shortages. The provider did not have robust systems to monitor or improve the quality of care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 27 February 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 27 February 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Adrian O'Brien
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 27 November 2018. Latest assessment published 27 February 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from Lincolnshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 2 beds at Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street.
When was Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street was published on 27 February 2025.
Who runs Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street?
Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street is run by Adrian O'Brien.
What is Adrian O'Brien Rachel Amiee O'Brien - 122 Scorer Street's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 27 February 2025.

Contact

Phone
01522 804167
Address
122 Scorer Street, Lincoln, LN5 7SX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Homer Lodge Care Centre (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Canwick Court Care Centre (Good, 0.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Homer Lodge Care Centre Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Monson Retirement Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Canwick Court Care Centre Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Eastholme Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Lincoln Manor Care Home Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Lincolnshire

See all care homes in Canwick