Rated Care Homes

Ashring House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 214 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Ashring House: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, East Sussex

Rated Good in December 2025.

Ashring House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Holm Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Lime Tree House Residential Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Parris Lawn Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    Claydon House Not yet rated, 2.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Barons Down Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.8 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Ringmer

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 December 2025 (assessment visit 20 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 12 November 2025 to 25 November 2025.

Ashring House is a care home providing personal care for up to 6 people with learning disabilities and, or autism. At the time of our assessment there were 6 people living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service was last inspected in August 2019 and rated Good. The assessment was triggered in response to receiving concerns regarding people’s safe care and support. At this inspection we did not identify any significant issues and the rating has remained Good, with some areas to improve.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found people received care and support in accordance with the principles of this guidance.

For the purpose of this report, we have concentrated on the period from May 2025 to present day due to changes to the management team and oversight of the service. During the assessment, there was a positive culture of safety, based on openness and transparency. In the main, people received safe care and staff managed risks safely from a sufficient number of suitably trained staff. Staff were recruited safely. People and staff told us they would feel confident to raise any concerns and that these would be responded to by the management team. There was an openness from staff that things had been difficult over the past few months, but with a new management team, they felt they could speak up and be listened to. The provider had liaised with external health professionals to provide joined up care and treatment for people. This had promoted safe transitions for people moving between different services. The premises were well maintained, and clean. Personal protective equipment (PPE) was used appropriately. Medicines were stored and administered safely.

People enjoyed their meals and were supported by staff to follow a healthy lifestyle.

Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and there was a positive and open culture in the service.

Systems were in place that allowed people, relatives and staff to speak up and have their voices heard. The provider had governance systems in place to identify any improvements required were identified and actioned. Staff felt the management team were open and approachable, and there were now regular opportunities for staff and management to discuss incidents or areas for improvement within the service to ensure lessons were learnt.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 3 October 2019. Latest assessment published 11 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Ashring House LimitedBrand: CareTech Community Services
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03370991 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ashring House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Ashring House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Ashring House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Ashring House.
When was Ashring House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ashring House was published on 11 December 2025.
Who runs Ashring House?
Ashring House is run by Ashring House Limited.
What is Ashring House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 December 2025.

Contact

Phone
01273 814400
Address
Lewes Road, Ringmer, Lewes, BN8 5ES Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Holm Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Lime Tree House Residential Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Parris Lawn Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    Claydon House Not yet rated, 2.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Barons Down Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.8 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Ringmer