Rated Care Homes

Highfields

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 12 of 219

    rated care homes in Derbyshire are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Highfields: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Derbyshire

Rated Outstanding in March 2026, up from Good.

Highfields: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Valleyview Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Jason Hylton Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Lorrianes Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Gresley House Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Derbyshire

See all care homes in Swadlincote

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 March 2026 (assessment visit 12 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Highfields is a residential care home that can provide support for up to 5 people. There were 5 people living at home at the time of the inspection. The inspection started on 17 December 2025 and concluded on 16 January 2026. This was a planned inspection due to an aged rating. The service provides support to people with profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD). The PMLD network describes a person with PMLD as someone who has more than one disability, has a profound learning disability, has great difficulty communicating, needs high levels of support with most aspects of daily life. They may have additional sensory or physical disabilities, complex health needs or mental health difficulties and may have behaviours that challenge us.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Outstanding
  • Well-led Outstanding
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have assessed the service against the, ‘right support, right care, right culture’ guidance. This enabled us to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Leaders and staff were exceptional and distinctive. Governance systems were well established, comprehensive, and operated effectively to monitor the quality of care and support people received. The management team carried out a structured programme of audits and quality checks, covering key areas such as care planning and risk management. Reviews were undertaken consistently and in line with the provider’s governance framework, ensuring emerging issues were detected at an early stage. When concerns were identified whether through audits, staff feedback, or routine oversight the management team acted promptly and proportionately, implementing clear action plans, following them through to completion.

Staff described the registered manager as an engaged, visible, and a highly competent leader who worked alongside them to maintain high standards of practice. They reported the registered manager had a strong understanding of people’s needs, modelled good practice, and was approachable when staff sought guidance. This contributed to a positive culture where staff felt supported, confident in their roles, and aligned with the provider’s expectations for safe, person centred care.

The staff team demonstrated an outstanding level of inclusivity, consistently placing people at the heart of all decisions relating to their care and treatment. Staff showed a deep understanding of each person’s individuality, actively encouraging them to express their views, preferences, and choices. This inclusive approach ensured people remained in full control of how they wished to be supported, and their voice shaped every aspect of their care.

When people’s needs changed, staff responded with remarkable attentiveness and collaboration. Decisions were made jointly, with staff working closely alongside people and, where appropriate, their representatives, to agree the most appropriate adjustments. This partnership led approach meant support remained not only responsive but truly personalised, reflecting what mattered most to each individual.

Holistic, person centred care was embedded throughout the service. Support plans were exceptionally detailed and rich in personalised information, providing a comprehensive picture of each person’s , identity, and preferences. These plans captured meaningful aspects of each person’s life, needs and desires.

People were treated with kindness and respect. Staff respected people’s privacy and dignity and supported people to feel safe. People were supported to maintain their health. Support plans were regularly reviewed and updated as required to ensure they remained effective and responsive to any changes in people’s health.

People were supported in the least restrictive way, in line with legal requirements and in people’s best interests. Robust safeguarding systems were in place to protect people from the risk of harm or abuse. Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and acted appropriately when concerns were raised.

Medicines were managed well and safely. People received their medicines as prescribed, with regular checks in place to ensure correct storage, administration, and documentation. There were enough safely recruited and suitably skilled staff to meet people’s needs. Infection prevention and control measures were implemented effectively.

Staff worked in partnership with health and social care professionals to help people achieve positive outcomes. Staff had a clear understanding of people’s rights and how to uphold them in their daily duties. Staff felt supported and valued by the registered manager and received access to regular supervision and training.

There was an open and inclusive culture where staff felt confident to raise concerns. These were acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. The provider promoted a culture of continuous improvement and learning.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Outstanding

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment, the rating remains outstanding. This meant services were tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  5. Well-led

    Outstanding

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant service leadership was exceptional and distinctive. Leaders and the culture they created drove and improved high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rachael Mossie
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Achieve Together LimitedBrand: Achieve Together
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03153442 (opens Companies House)

Achieve Together Limited runs 160 services in England, 17 of them in the East Midlands. 128 are rated Good or Outstanding, 25 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 7 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Achieve Together Limited

  1. O
    Addington Road Outstanding. Care home, North Northamptonshire
  2. O
    Hayway Outstanding. Care home, North Northamptonshire
  3. O
    Irchester 168 Outstanding. Care home, North Northamptonshire
  4. O
    Restormel House Outstanding. Care home, Plymouth, South West

See all 160 services run by Achieve Together Limited

Getting help from Derbyshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Highfields provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Highfields as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Highfields have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Highfields.
When was Highfields last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Highfields was published on 25 March 2026.
Who runs Highfields?
Highfields is run by Achieve Together Limited. It runs 160 services in England, 17 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Highfields's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 25 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01283 224658
Address
Highfield Road, Swadlincote, DE11 9AR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Valleyview Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Jason Hylton Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Lorrianes Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Gresley House Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Derbyshire

See all care homes in Swadlincote