Rated Care Homes

Longford

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 234 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Longford: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Surrey

Rated Good in December 2019.

Longford: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Smallbrook Care Home Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Malvern House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Roseleigh Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Upfield Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Wykeham House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Horley

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 19 December 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Longford is a residential care home providing personal care to six younger and older adults at the time of the inspection. The service can support up to six people living with a learning disability and/or autism. Some people were also living with physical disabilities.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Services for people with learning disabilities and or autism are supported. Longford is a domestic house which has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service received planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

The service was in a residential area on a road with other large domestic homes of a similar size. There were deliberately no identifying signs, intercom, cameras, industrial bins or anything else outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff did not wear a uniform or anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

What inspectors found

People living at Longford had little or no verbal communication. However, they appeared relaxed and happy with staff, who supported them to be as independent as possible. People were encouraged to develop life skills and get involved in activities in and outside the service. People were also supported to go on holiday. Care records contained detailed accurate information about each person's risks, needs and preferences. Care plans described activities people enjoyed doing both in the service and in the community. People were supported to remain in contact with family and friends, who were able to visit when they wanted.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service held records on a computerised system which meant staff were able to access up-to-date information which they could update when care and support was provided. Systems to safeguard people from abuse were in place.

There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs. The recruitment process helped ensure potential staff were safe to work with people who may be vulnerable. Staff received training and the support needed to carry out their role. Staff undertook training when they first started working at the service. Staff updated their training regularly to ensure they were up to date with best practice.

Where there were restrictions placed on people, these were done within legal requirements, such as the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Staff were knowledgeable about how to support each person to minimise risks to themselves while enabling them to have a fulfilled and enjoyable life. The service used positive behaviour support principles to support people in the least restrictive way. Where restrictive intervention practices were used, these were documented and supported people to remain safe.

People received their medicines from staff who had been trained to administer mednage the storage, administration and disposal of medicines.

The manager had registered with the Care Quality Commission and understood their responsibilities. Audits and checks were carried out to ensure the safety and quality of the service. Senior managers visited the service regularly and engaged the registered manager and staff in improvements.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jeremiah Coscar
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 19 December 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Peak 15 Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06258845 (opens Companies House)

Peak 15 Ltd runs 9 services, all in the South East. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Peak 15 Ltd

  1. O
    Mill Green Outstanding. Care home, Surrey
  2. O
    Peak 15 Ltd Outstanding. Home care, Surrey
  3. G
    Malvern House Good. Care home, Surrey
  4. G
    Spring Park Good. Care home, Surrey

See all 9 services run by Peak 15 Ltd

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Longford provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Longford as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Longford have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Longford.
When was Longford last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Longford was published on 19 December 2019.
Who runs Longford?
Longford is run by Peak 15 Ltd. It runs 9 services, all in the South East.
What is Longford's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 December 2019.

Contact

Phone
01293 430687
Address
40 Massetts Road, Horley, RH6 7DS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Smallbrook Care Home Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Malvern House Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Roseleigh Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Upfield Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Wykeham House Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Horley